When anti gun “experts” want to debate you
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (137)
sorted by:
It's a senseless term. I have assault fists. I have an assault ball bat. I have an assault car. I have an assault slingshot.
I don't care what the "media" says. I don't even have a TV.
BTW, the M4 is a gas-operated carbine and has nothing in common with the AR-15 but a similarity in looks, which doesn't count.
Yeah but it's a viable term, that's all I'm saying, any weapon can be an assault weapon, like you say yourself, so why not a rifle?
They are using the term to imply that the only purpose of that rifle is to shoot innocent people offensively, which isn't true. It's purpose is personal defense or hunting.
Yeah but, instead of getting on the defensive and stop using the term altogether, I'd say use it the way it makes more sense, you have designated marksman rifles, you have hunting rifles, you have precision/sniper rifles, why not have a assault rifle category which serves a very clear and specific purpose/has a definite set of characteristics.
My thinking is the more gun owners get defensive over the term, the more leftist sheep think there's some credence to the propaganda.
I could be wrong anyway, but my only point is that TO ME the term makes sense, reasons stated in my op.
There is no "very clear and specific purpose" for an "assault rifle." The AR-15 is used for defense and for hunting.
If you have ever fired a fully automatic weapon, I don't think you would be holding onto your somewhat silly argument that a select fire M4A1 and an AR-15 are remotely alike. Granted some versions of the M4 will only fire short three-round burst automatically, but these are used by admin types, cooks, etc., and not combat troops. The so-called M4s sold in the civilian market look like military M4s, but are really AR-15s, which are semiautomatic and quite difficult to convert to a fully automatic military rifle no matter what some say.
OK but it fires the same round, yes or no?
If you have an M4 set for semi-auto, and an AR-15, then you fire both, using the exact same ammunition, functionally, ballistically, they will act and operate the exact same yes or no?
Full-auto/semi auto was not what I meant
The M4 is chambered in 5.56 Nato M855
The AR-15 is chambered in
.22 Nosler
.223 Remington
.224 Valkyrie
.25-45 Sharps
5.56 Nato
6.5 Grendel
6.8 SPC
.30 Remington AR
.300 Ham’r
.300 Blackout
.350 Legend
.450 Bushmaster
.458 Socom
You just don't know shit about ARs maybe you should stick to crayons.
The caliber of a rifle has no bearing in the classification of a "assault weapon" all calibers up to .50 are legal. So what's your point?
Just exactly what do you mean???
Disney is a viable term as well, but I'm still calling them Groomer(s). Or Q and Anons vs. QANON. I pick the term that is going to piss the left off more and stick with it.