When anti gun “experts” want to debate you
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (137)
sorted by:
Because if you had you would know that the AR-15 could never be used as an assault weapon. It is a very small caliber, hardly larger than a kids first .22 semiautomatic. It looks menacing but it isnt. Consumer grade body armor is effective against it and military grade armor isnt dented by it. It is a small light weapon with no kick. It is a fun platform to shoot and is easily handled by women and children. It isnt a gun you would use to hunt a deer and definitely wouldnt be my first choice, or even 10th choice, as a defensive or offensive platform. As far as weapons go, it is hardly more than a toy.
Have you ever watched a biathalon? Where the athlete cross country skis and then shoots at targets from a standing, kneeling or prone position? You see them hit the target and it is like a plink? That is similar to your basic .556 or .223 round for an AR-15. Accurate, with a fairly high rate of fire, but with no stopping power. Shoot a large man with it and if it isnt in the head he will keep on coming.
So let me get this straight, a 556 round, has the same kinetic energy than a 22 lr? is that what you're saying?
There's one guy saying "assault" can be used for anything, so it shouldn't be used, but your logic takes the cake, it shouldn't be used because it's just a toy, therefore it doesn't even qualify as "assault", boy the US military sure is brave by sending all their forces with a toy gun to conflicts all this time.
You guys getting all your panties on fire by the use of the term "assault" is very funny, it's just a word, the meaning could be very fitting, you're being played by propaganda just as leftist sheep do, only in reverse, you just don't realize it.
In a lot of states it is illegal to hunt deer with the 5.56 because it lacks the knock down power to cleanly kill.
When the military was transitioning from the 7.62 to the 5.56 extensive studies concluded, in rounds per killed the 7.62 was far superior.
The 5.56 was chosen in part because of its ability to wound not kill. Requiring manpower to remove the wounded from the field, care for the wounded, the economic cost to provide for the wounded and the moral lost of the society while looking at the wounded.
You've been a member for a while, and have points on the board, I'll assume you are just ignorant on the subject, I suggest you study some more.
That a 5.56 is less powerful than a 308 is obvious friend...
I was arguing the notion the previous user stated, that a 5.56 rifle has the same injury capacity as a 22lr weapon... And that its nothing more than a toy (his own words)
He also said you can shoot a man in the head with a 5.56 and he just will keep coming, you agree with that too?
The US military doesnt use AR-15s lol.
... what round do M4s shoot? what round do AR-15s shoot?