When anti gun “experts” want to debate you
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (137)
sorted by:
OK but it fires the same round, yes or no?
If you have an M4 set for semi-auto, and an AR-15, then you fire both, using the exact same ammunition, functionally, ballistically, they will act and operate the exact same yes or no?
Full-auto/semi auto was not what I meant
The M4 is chambered in 5.56 Nato M855
The AR-15 is chambered in
.22 Nosler
.223 Remington
.224 Valkyrie
.25-45 Sharps
5.56 Nato
6.5 Grendel
6.8 SPC
.30 Remington AR
.300 Ham’r
.300 Blackout
.350 Legend
.450 Bushmaster
.458 Socom
You just don't know shit about ARs maybe you should stick to crayons.
OH MY!!! YOU DON'T SAY!!!!?!?!?!!!!
Now answer the question posed to this comment you just replied to, I thought I had posed said question quite clearly, that even a retard could understand it, evidently I was wrong, here I'll repeat it in case you are too stupid to go back and read it again:
You keep spewing these obvious factoids about firearms, as if you're the only one that knows them, you really think I didn't know AR-15's are chambered in a number of different calibers?
Again you fail to understand the point of my arguments, and it's amazing how stupid you'd have to be to miss em.
That's funny the question that preface your post like it was proven fact was:
Sooo that would be a
fuck NO
Do you know what a zip gun is?
It's funny, there was a comment posted, not long ago, it went something like this:
You recognize the comment?
So it doesn't fire the same round?
this is truly amazing stuff, it's like trying to explain advanced mathematics to an amoeba 😂
The caliber of a rifle has no bearing in the classification of a "assault weapon" all calibers up to .50 are legal. So what's your point?
Just exactly what do you mean???
Ok, lemme try to break the discussion down for you, since you obviously have serious problems with text interpretation.
All I said at the beginning was that FOR ME, the term assault rifle made sense, given the story of the sturmgewehr (yes, which comes from the STG-44..) and the literal interpretation of its name, and why it was the reason why I (as in ME, JUST ME, PERSONALLY) believed the AR stood for Assault Rifle, that's all I said.
Then at some point the discussion turned to the US military using AR-15's or not, I have no qualms in admitting I didn't know the M4 had a different gas-system, but what I said in this post to which you just replied, was to try and explain the point that even though the platform might be different, they essentially work the same, they fire the same round, they have the same lethal potential, and they operate mostly the same, since they're both based out of the same platform.
So these are two different discussions you see? again I know it's difficult for you to understand, but I have some crayons around here somewhere, I could draw something for you if it's going to make it easier.
I've worked on, around, and with weapons including the AR platform most of my life.
Save your crayons for yourself.
I'm not questioning that, the crayons are meant to help you understand the discussion, which you just clearly don't.