You may be correct. Thanks for the link. Good reading.

Would you care to share your opinion regarding these Musk posts?

Do you think they are comms being used, and if so, for what and/or what are they communicating. Interested on your take.

What your opinion of the prior commentators questions?

Someone is planning to extinguish the Eternal Flame burning at the JFK gravesite as an act of disrespect or domestic terrorism? Or; ~is it suggesting a metaphorical extinguishing of JFK's legacy? Or;.... - is what Musk might be attempting to communicate to..... whoever? 

There are many reasons why....

Would you like to offer a few examples?

Also, are you saying that you think these posts by Musk are comms targeted for a wide "comms aware" group of people? Or are you simply saying that my interpretations of the "comms" significance of Musk's post is wrong?

Remember when Q said "learn our comms"? This means, the application of logic, due diligence and empirical evidence.

Allow me to clarify and elaborate. What I mean is, when Q said "learn our comms" it should involve the using the tools of logic, dd, and empirical evidence - tools that Q consistently exhorted us to develop. I agree that it's mistaken to equate these tools with comms. It's not what I intended to say.

I understand Q asking us to learn their comms was asking an inviting anons to develop the ability to firstly understand what and how Q was communicating, and also understand how the DS cabal have been using comms in a multitude of ways.

I have a concern, however, that far too many pedes simply jump on the idea that every single thing is comms, and also that the comms mean what they think it means, without applying due diligence, logic and empirical data.

That's what I'm speaking about. If one is going to engage with the world on that level, it's important to apply those tools. Otherwise, you just get reactive people who leap to conclusions and misinterpret every single thing, leading to increased chaos, confusion and emotional upheaval. In my opinion.

Q 2007

Emotion clouds judgement.

Another case in point: after the 2018 midterms, anons and others were all freaking out about the results. This was creating turmoil in the GA community. Q dropped (Q2604):

....
Those who push simply have no grasp of reality. 
Those who push simply do not understand warfare tactics. 
Emotions cloud judgement.
Emotions cloud logic.
....

I'm inclined to think that amateurish approach to the issue of comms is actually quite unhelpful. That's what I meant when I (meant to write) "Remember: Q said learn our comms. This should be done with the application of logic, dd, and data, etc."

I'm quite interested in the link tho. Thanks.