There's no such thing as "gravity". It's just a "theory", and a bad one at that. There is no such "force/particle/field" that has ever been identified, because there's no such thing. Now, we can all agree that "what goes up, must come down". But this is very simple to explain with the already well-known forces of electro-magnetism, di-electric effects, density and buoyancy. The obvious and provable "forces" are really not all that complicated. Gravity is, and will always be unprovable, which naturally upholds the lie indefinitely.
The gravity lie serves many purposes. Roughly 70 years ago, it almost caught up with them when astrophysicists started realizing that they couldn't explain the densities and masses of so-called stars, planets, etc. in relation to gravity. It didn't work mathematically. Fortunately for them (but not for us), a new lie was born to keep the ruse going - "dark matter and dark energy". With that doozy, they could now explain how 95% of the universe was made up of more imaginary stuff in order to uphold their imaginary gravity....brilliant!
And a boatload of "biology", specifically "microbiology" is also completely made up. They've got a ton of things wrong, most prominently, that the "cell" is the basis of life. But sure, they can't lie about things that are obvious and verifiable by most of us, like food gives us energy, lifeforms need water and oxygen, etc.
See the work of biologist Harold Hillman, which is greatly censored and suppressed...of course. Just for starters, he demonstrated that most of the cellular "organelles" you'll find in any anatomy book aren't even real. They can be attributed to water bubbles, artifacts and effects of the metallic staining process in general. He agrees with the nucleus and mitochondria, but says things like the golgi complex, endoplasmic reticulum, ribosomes (ribs of the body), etc. are all 100% made up nothingburgers. And as usual, rather than anybody debate his findings, he just got smeared and of course zero access to government funding.
You'll find in all walks of life, we've basically been taught 20% truth, 40% half-truths and 40% outright lies. It's a magic formula. They figured out long ago that they're able to keep their deceptions alive due to the tiny percentage of truths embedded in their lies. And the most important "truths" are the things that are quite obvious to the majority of us.
A great example is any modern medical anatomy textbook. Each chapter spends about 20% of the text discussing "gross anatomy" which is plainly obvious to anybody who cares to look at a body. The next 40% is a mixture of gross and fine anatomy stealthily blended together which is kind of a mix of obvious stuff with not-so-obvious stuff. And then when you get down to the "fine anatomy", it's a free-for-all. They can never explain how they know all the things they say they know at this level. There are no videos of course, and at best grainy pictures of dead, static tissue (which is Hillman's primary criticism). Basically, they're not looking at anything that's "alive" as they have to kill the cell to see it under the electron microscope. So how they think they can explain all these intricate details of the body's life processes strains credulity at best, because nobody has ever actually SEEN it happening. So it's a safe bet that they just made up a ton of it, much like the cell's organelles and their wildly intricate "functions".
So the majority of people think; "well they're not lying about this, that and the other thing, so what makes you think they're lying about all the rest?". And true to form, this stance stifles curiosity and deeper dives into their claims 99% of the time. People are so preoccupied with earning a living and being entertained, very few feel like they have time to take in anything beyond a sound-byte.
They lie to us about things that are fundamental to our understanding of reality that we can't easily verify for ourselves. Ultimately this strategy keeps "them" in a position of power as the masses fumble and stumble about, awash in ignorance arguing over the mountain of lies they've fed us.
The previous commenter is quite right. They're lying to us about everything in major ways. There's no major institution or major field of study that's an exception that I've yet to come across.
They all "spread the lie" because they don't realize it's a lie. Such is the nature of things. They believe and trust their teachers, who believed and trusted their teachers, etc., etc.
Blind trust in authority is the root cause. Almost nobody questions things any longer, and if they do, they usually get run out of their profession as "trouble-makers".
Who would doubt that viruses aren't real? That gravity doesn't exist? That cancer kills people? A tiny few by my reckoning.
Gravity seems pretty real. I was taught that. Biology is real. Learned that.
Not according to modern science and politicians.
Yeah! We can't even define a woman anymore without multiple sessions of Congress to debate it.
There's no such thing as "gravity". It's just a "theory", and a bad one at that. There is no such "force/particle/field" that has ever been identified, because there's no such thing. Now, we can all agree that "what goes up, must come down". But this is very simple to explain with the already well-known forces of electro-magnetism, di-electric effects, density and buoyancy. The obvious and provable "forces" are really not all that complicated. Gravity is, and will always be unprovable, which naturally upholds the lie indefinitely.
The gravity lie serves many purposes. Roughly 70 years ago, it almost caught up with them when astrophysicists started realizing that they couldn't explain the densities and masses of so-called stars, planets, etc. in relation to gravity. It didn't work mathematically. Fortunately for them (but not for us), a new lie was born to keep the ruse going - "dark matter and dark energy". With that doozy, they could now explain how 95% of the universe was made up of more imaginary stuff in order to uphold their imaginary gravity....brilliant!
And a boatload of "biology", specifically "microbiology" is also completely made up. They've got a ton of things wrong, most prominently, that the "cell" is the basis of life. But sure, they can't lie about things that are obvious and verifiable by most of us, like food gives us energy, lifeforms need water and oxygen, etc.
See the work of biologist Harold Hillman, which is greatly censored and suppressed...of course. Just for starters, he demonstrated that most of the cellular "organelles" you'll find in any anatomy book aren't even real. They can be attributed to water bubbles, artifacts and effects of the metallic staining process in general. He agrees with the nucleus and mitochondria, but says things like the golgi complex, endoplasmic reticulum, ribosomes (ribs of the body), etc. are all 100% made up nothingburgers. And as usual, rather than anybody debate his findings, he just got smeared and of course zero access to government funding.
You'll find in all walks of life, we've basically been taught 20% truth, 40% half-truths and 40% outright lies. It's a magic formula. They figured out long ago that they're able to keep their deceptions alive due to the tiny percentage of truths embedded in their lies. And the most important "truths" are the things that are quite obvious to the majority of us.
A great example is any modern medical anatomy textbook. Each chapter spends about 20% of the text discussing "gross anatomy" which is plainly obvious to anybody who cares to look at a body. The next 40% is a mixture of gross and fine anatomy stealthily blended together which is kind of a mix of obvious stuff with not-so-obvious stuff. And then when you get down to the "fine anatomy", it's a free-for-all. They can never explain how they know all the things they say they know at this level. There are no videos of course, and at best grainy pictures of dead, static tissue (which is Hillman's primary criticism). Basically, they're not looking at anything that's "alive" as they have to kill the cell to see it under the electron microscope. So how they think they can explain all these intricate details of the body's life processes strains credulity at best, because nobody has ever actually SEEN it happening. So it's a safe bet that they just made up a ton of it, much like the cell's organelles and their wildly intricate "functions".
So the majority of people think; "well they're not lying about this, that and the other thing, so what makes you think they're lying about all the rest?". And true to form, this stance stifles curiosity and deeper dives into their claims 99% of the time. People are so preoccupied with earning a living and being entertained, very few feel like they have time to take in anything beyond a sound-byte.
They lie to us about things that are fundamental to our understanding of reality that we can't easily verify for ourselves. Ultimately this strategy keeps "them" in a position of power as the masses fumble and stumble about, awash in ignorance arguing over the mountain of lies they've fed us.
The previous commenter is quite right. They're lying to us about everything in major ways. There's no major institution or major field of study that's an exception that I've yet to come across.
So would Christian astrophysicists continue to spread the lie?
They all "spread the lie" because they don't realize it's a lie. Such is the nature of things. They believe and trust their teachers, who believed and trusted their teachers, etc., etc.
Blind trust in authority is the root cause. Almost nobody questions things any longer, and if they do, they usually get run out of their profession as "trouble-makers".
Who would doubt that viruses aren't real? That gravity doesn't exist? That cancer kills people? A tiny few by my reckoning.
My physiology professor said the more we don’t know about a subject the more books are written about it.