Maybe they're baiting the hook. Now that the deep state knows a package in en route, will they be tempted to intercept it or tamper with it? Perhaps there are safe guards in place to detect or protect against something like that happening. Or maybe even to track who does the tampering.
We've seen President Trump do this on many occasions - lure the deep state into making (sometimes) very public mistakes. Maybe Gregg is taking a page from the same strategy?
I am quickly thinking despite his role in 2000 Mules and ongoing stuff (apparently), this guy is not adding up one way or the other.
Announcing big boom coming - why? Why not just let it hit? (Counterpoint: make the bad guys shit themselves and mess up more?)
Ukraine stuff - assertions he knows more than almost anyone, yet seems unaware of big things like biolabs (which let's recall are NOT just Russian propaganda but were on US gov't websites before scrubbed)
This
I don't know if we should be worried because if he's on the wrong side much is probably sabotaged/doomed, or just concerned because for someone in his field he's not real good with seemingly basic tradecraft....
“we have the tech, and are using it...you’re just to dumb to figure that out. Now, we’ll prove it in court.”
..kinda deal? I figure it’s a strategic move. Tech has probably been working for over a year. Now he’ll just advertise it. I may be way off here though.
I dunno - I figured let's see what he himself says:
"Replying to @greggphillips
Question: Why advertise this?
Gregg Phillips
@greggphillips
·
13m
Replying to @greggphillips and @PepeSee
Because the people need to know and the bad people already do know. Level the playing field."
Edit: continued:
"PepeSee
@PepeSee
·
15m
Replying to @greggphillips
The bad people know about the tech sure, but they now know it's not defeated as of yet (but it's being worked on). Seems the playing field just got leveled a bit indeed, in their favor. Wouldn't the normal pattern be to allow them to continue thinking it's working with no announcement till they found out (by say being arrested) that in fact it didn't?
Gregg Phillips
@greggphillips
·
2m
Replying to @greggphillips and @PepeSee
No. We are seeing evidence of its use in other countries."
What. It's like he didn't even understand the question.
Interesting. It’s like we are showing our hand to cover known operatives. Like look, we know you know, and now you know that we know..you know? So now what strategy are you, the deepstate, gonna come up with. Like force of hand.
Why would you advertise your operational plan?
That does seem counterintuitive, doesn't it?
Maybe they're baiting the hook. Now that the deep state knows a package in en route, will they be tempted to intercept it or tamper with it? Perhaps there are safe guards in place to detect or protect against something like that happening. Or maybe even to track who does the tampering.
We've seen President Trump do this on many occasions - lure the deep state into making (sometimes) very public mistakes. Maybe Gregg is taking a page from the same strategy?
He’s basically planning a counterintelligence operation and disclosing his methods in advance of opgo. Makes no sense to me.
For real. I wouldn't go around broadcasting to the baddies that we learned how to use their stuff.
I am quickly thinking despite his role in 2000 Mules and ongoing stuff (apparently), this guy is not adding up one way or the other.
Announcing big boom coming - why? Why not just let it hit? (Counterpoint: make the bad guys shit themselves and mess up more?)
Ukraine stuff - assertions he knows more than almost anyone, yet seems unaware of big things like biolabs (which let's recall are NOT just Russian propaganda but were on US gov't websites before scrubbed)
This
I don't know if we should be worried because if he's on the wrong side much is probably sabotaged/doomed, or just concerned because for someone in his field he's not real good with seemingly basic tradecraft....
But isn’t this more of a;
“we have the tech, and are using it...you’re just to dumb to figure that out. Now, we’ll prove it in court.”
..kinda deal? I figure it’s a strategic move. Tech has probably been working for over a year. Now he’ll just advertise it. I may be way off here though.
I dunno - I figured let's see what he himself says:
"Replying to @greggphillips
Question: Why advertise this?
Gregg Phillips
@greggphillips · 13m Replying to @greggphillips and @PepeSee
Because the people need to know and the bad people already do know. Level the playing field."
Edit: continued:
"PepeSee
@PepeSee · 15m Replying to @greggphillips
The bad people know about the tech sure, but they now know it's not defeated as of yet (but it's being worked on). Seems the playing field just got leveled a bit indeed, in their favor. Wouldn't the normal pattern be to allow them to continue thinking it's working with no announcement till they found out (by say being arrested) that in fact it didn't?
Gregg Phillips
@greggphillips · 2m Replying to @greggphillips and @PepeSee
No. We are seeing evidence of its use in other countries."
What. It's like he didn't even understand the question.
Interesting. It’s like we are showing our hand to cover known operatives. Like look, we know you know, and now you know that we know..you know? So now what strategy are you, the deepstate, gonna come up with. Like force of hand.
..I don’t know.
Lol... this isn't something someone in opsec would advertise. This part seems a bit fishy. Maybe intentional misinfo op?
Monitor and control. All assets evaluated daily. Let’s see what he does.
ICYMI, check out my comment further down in this subthread. I asked the guy and he's not even making sense.
he could be limited on what he can say in public. ongoing op sec....maybe..or not. diff going keep eyes on him.