Modern Christianity has turned into a globohomo promoting parasitical institution. Female leaders, dykes, trannies, fags given high ranking positions.
Bending rules and accepting homosexuality under the guise of "Jesus loves all".
The old "hate the sin not the sinner" bullshit which has been fundamental in causing modern Christians to accept homos into their lives and church as if the Bible isn't crystal clear on what the crime and punishment is.
Pedos everywhere, money being laundered from crime syndicates and pushing covid, jabs, WEF you name it.
By human nature we do NOT respect those who fold on their principles. No one is going to respect an institution that is weak and can't hold steadfast the rules of God.
This isn't to say that man doesn't make mistakes. But what the Church does is not mistakes. It is by design to corrupt our youth and mold our minds.
I do NOT believe Jesus Christ was some pussy who accepted everything. I highly doubt Christ would walk into a gay pride today and love every homo who wears a diaper and dances in front of children with degenerate parents who bring them there.
Christ rampages through the temple when he witnessed the corruption with money just imagine what he would do if he saw this degenerate modern day garbage filling our streets.
Now think what you may of Muslims but at least they have held their beliefs together for the most part. I've NEVER witnessed a Muslim family accept faggotry. Never.
Same with Jews. Lots of gay Jews and their people certainly push it onto society (Khazars) but you'll never see that shit openly accepted in their communities.
Every third pastor these days is half a fag and allows it in his church.
Jesus is the intermediary and only through Him does one reach the Father. Congregation at the church of believers is a house of prayer and is for uniting people together in prayer for a more powerful form. When congregations forget this precept, then the congregation devolves into a form of group think. Bible studies are a good place to share individual readings and discovery. The church congregation needs to focus most on the power of prayer.
"Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me." -- John 14:6
"I am the gate. If anyone enters through Me, he will be saved. He will come in and go out and find pasture." -- John 10:9
You better lawyer up. Jesus is your lawyer. He represents you.
It is admitted by all church authorities that no record of anything Jesus said was recorded.
His father according to the Bible was a wicked alien called yahweh. Yahweh is neither immortal or a God..he drank 6 litres of wine a day and then beer he liked the abdomen fat of women and babies..there are over 600 commandments he left with tribe of Jacob who picked him as their commander. There are written records..it was only 5000 years ago!! Jesus was a hybrid alien but not immortal. His mother and Mary's mother also hybrid aliens.read your Bible..but as there was no word for god in old hebrew or eternity when you read god think elohim..or angel or lord.it is the aliens
See my comments for links.
You are referring to the biblical manuscripts, A manuscript is a handwritten copy of an original writing. Obviously, the tape recorder was not invented yet. So, all manuscripts were hand copied.
There are 24,363 manuscripts of the Bible. After the papyri manuscripts were discovered, an abundance of other manuscripts came to light. We have manuscripts that date to 60 AD within a generation of Jesus' live (i.e. Magdalene papyrus, 7Q4 and 7Q5 of Qumran 68 AD).
There are tests of historiography that all books of antiquity are judged by for their authenticity. In comparison, Aristotle wrote his writings of poetics in 343 BC and yet the earliest copy [manuscript] we have is dated 1100 AD. That’s nearly a 1,400-year gap in time. Only 5 manuscripts are in existence. Caesar composed his history of the Gallic wars between 58 – 50 BC and yet the earliest copy we have is a 1,000 years after his death. Only 9 to 10 copies now exist.
Incredibly, people do not question the authenticity of these writings. We take them to be fact. I have alluded to one of the tests of historiography where the number of manuscripts and the earliest copies are evaluated. This is called the Bibliography test. I can challenge anyone to muster up the top 10 read books of antiquity and they still won’t come close to authenticity of the Bible. In addition to this, we have the living line of “Church fathers,” (Ignatius, Polycarp, Clement of Rome, et al.) From these writings outside of the New Testament, there is the entire New Testament – all but 11 verses. They quote the writings of the gospel and epistles 232 times.
The Internal Evidence test is another feature of the Tests of historiography. This test examines what the writers have said about the events that took place. Aristotle’s dictum is implied – “The benefit of the doubt is to be given to the document itself, and not arrogated by the critic to himself.” As an analogy, if I told you I owned a green coat, it is your responsibility to prove I do not own one. Until then, it is assumed that this is indeed the truth. In law, I believe this premise is called the law of presumption.
You will find at least 23 different times the writers of the New Testament recorded they were “eye witnesses.” Moreover, they proclaimed Christ Jesus and His resurrection often to hostile crowds. They appealed to the knowledge of their listeners when speaking about Jesus’ resurrection. They spoke of it as a fact, as common knowledge, which any public speaker knows is risky business. They wrote about people, places, times that corroborated with each other’s testimony. Each writer expresses the story from their personal experience, from how the events affected them just as witnesses today would describe indelible events they experienced. These Gospel writers died terrible deaths. Peter, James (son of Apheas), Andrew, Philip, Simon, and Bartholomew were all crucified. Matthew and James (son of Zebedee) died from the sword. Thaddeaus was killed by arrows. And the brother of Jesus was stoned to death. John was dipped in boiling oil several times, but wouldn’t die. He must have impressed his torturers because he was then exiled.
The External Evidence test is the third test of historiography. It accounts for whether other historical material confirms or denies the internal evidence found in the manuscripts. There are over 21 documents that are widely accepted by archeologists outside of the books of the Bible. These all confirm the message of the New Testament. Some of these are Flavius Josephus, Justin Martyr, Plineus Secondus, Tertullian, Cornelius Tacitus, Hippolytus, Polycarp, Lucian of Samosata, Suetonius, Thallus, Phlegon, Mara bar-Serepion, the Talmud, Eusibius, Irenaeaus, Ignatius, Origen, Cyprian, Clement of Rome, et. al.