Yes. I use literacy in my thought process to decode the words of others. For instance, reading my words you would see that I didn’t say he’s as bad as Obama I said his fame stems from a bad thing (the presidency of his half brother) and I wish it had not occurred.
Now I see the problem. You have to read a whole sentence, not a piece of one, to understand what it says/means.
The significance of "kenyan" in the sentence is that without an obama presidency kenyans would be all but totally irrelevant to me--as proved by the fact that the only kenyans quoted on all of GAW are obamas.
You and I just have different thought processes.
I tend to individualize my thoughts when it comes to people. I organize people by their names.
I don't assoicate what one similar person does with what another similar person does.
I am not saying you are wrong. I just don't think the same when it comes to people.
Yes. I use literacy in my thought process to decode the words of others. For instance, reading my words you would see that I didn’t say he’s as bad as Obama I said his fame stems from a bad thing (the presidency of his half brother) and I wish it had not occurred.
You said
" I didn't have to even think about anything any Kenyan says."
Why mention Kenyan at all? What is the significance of it?
Now I see the problem. You have to read a whole sentence, not a piece of one, to understand what it says/means.
The significance of "kenyan" in the sentence is that without an obama presidency kenyans would be all but totally irrelevant to me--as proved by the fact that the only kenyans quoted on all of GAW are obamas.
Ok. I just don’t see any value for including it. But to each their own.