I know how "basic" gravity supposedly works. Still, have you seen water bend? Do you think it bends over the curvature? Do you think ships tilt in this bendy water?
Ok handshake.
I just thought you knew the Earth is actually a triangle. Yeah, it was modelled after a TR3B and it's being held up by the turtle island from Zelda: Majoras Mask. Totally bro. 😆🤣
Stay off the psy-op "anti weed" reefer madness sites. Weed expands the consciousness past this 3rd density wall of bullshit. Hemp can literally change the world. If the cabal changes to this. But we know they are trying to kill us literally. So they keep this plant illegal to us. Ever asked urself why people go to jail over a plant that grows naturally? I mean besides prison being basically re-branded slavery???
Not arguing against that. It's just that some people don't do well on it and should not consume it; and even those that are more introspective in nature will be better served by not smoking it regularly.
Ever asked urself why people go to jail over a plant that grows naturally?
Yeah, I've been through the same phase many years ago. Yeah, it's telling, especially with tobacco being so readily available.
Anyway, I don't think smoking regularly is good for you, whatever the Joe Rogans would rather have you believe.
Whether or not there is a better theory of gravity is irrelevant. ANY replacement theory of gravity must reduce to the known models of gravity given simplifying assumptions. You don't get to throw out all known physics when you replace a theory with something else. So if you want to be taken seriously, you must be able to describe the specific mathematical conditions where your new theory reduces to the relativistic equivalent.
Listen to some of Leonard Susskind's lectures on how they are trying to map new theories of gravity in the bulk to information complexity on the boundary surface (what is called AdS/CFT correspondence, even though everyone realizes that the simplifying assumption of anti de-sitter space is invalid for our universe). He does an excellent job of showing how you can do this and get back to the well known formulas under specific assumptions.
Again, you can not simply discard old theories of gravity wholesale. Whether you want to believe it or not, millions of students have verified the old theories with astonishing accuracy. They aren't all part of the cabal and lying to you. Geologists measure propagation of vibrations through the earth's mantle. If a large portion of the interior were hollow, it would be obvious. Now, there could be pockets that are hollow and hidden underground somehow escaping detection, but not the entire earth.
So yes, I will accept your offer. Please explain to me (using actual math) what exactly is the theory you are proposing, and importantly how it reduces to Einstein's well proven theory under specific, limiting assumptions.
This is all a wonderful opinion. But I don't see anything here that even remotely resembles a mathematical equation, or a theory that even reduces to a mathematical expression in any form.
I am all for exploring the spiritual side of humanity. However that does not remove the physical side of our existence. I am quite happy to consider any theory which genuinely advances the human condition.
But if you are asking if I trust your opinion or math more? I trust math. I am not allowing anyone to stay in power. I am just being human. Math is the language of our universe. If anyone is going to try and explain our physical reality, they need to become fluent in the language that defines it.
You are certainly welcome to your belief as well. But if you truly understand what you wrote above, then you will be able to translate that into a language the rest of us can understand and work with.
You must not know much about "flat earth" if you'd rather consider this over that.
Normie-level FE is indeed a psyop, but how isn't HE? It glorifies the same nonsense that NASA and (((they))) want you to believe (aliens, "our precious earth", nukes, pole shifts, etc.).
Still a better theory than flat earth
How is the absence of curvature a theory? How is water not bending a theory?
I think you need to go back to the 3rd grade if you dont know how basic gravity works
I know how "basic" gravity supposedly works. Still, have you seen water bend? Do you think it bends over the curvature? Do you think ships tilt in this bendy water?
It's called gravity, Karen. Lol
Grow up, fren, and lay off that weed while you're at it.
Ok handshake. I just thought you knew the Earth is actually a triangle. Yeah, it was modelled after a TR3B and it's being held up by the turtle island from Zelda: Majoras Mask. Totally bro. 😆🤣
Stay off the psy-op "anti weed" reefer madness sites. Weed expands the consciousness past this 3rd density wall of bullshit. Hemp can literally change the world. If the cabal changes to this. But we know they are trying to kill us literally. So they keep this plant illegal to us. Ever asked urself why people go to jail over a plant that grows naturally? I mean besides prison being basically re-branded slavery???
Not arguing against that. It's just that some people don't do well on it and should not consume it; and even those that are more introspective in nature will be better served by not smoking it regularly.
Yeah, I've been through the same phase many years ago. Yeah, it's telling, especially with tobacco being so readily available.
Anyway, I don't think smoking regularly is good for you, whatever the Joe Rogans would rather have you believe.
Nice cgi throughout the entire video.
Interesting: a heaven with clouds... inside the globe. Hm.
Whether or not there is a better theory of gravity is irrelevant. ANY replacement theory of gravity must reduce to the known models of gravity given simplifying assumptions. You don't get to throw out all known physics when you replace a theory with something else. So if you want to be taken seriously, you must be able to describe the specific mathematical conditions where your new theory reduces to the relativistic equivalent.
Listen to some of Leonard Susskind's lectures on how they are trying to map new theories of gravity in the bulk to information complexity on the boundary surface (what is called AdS/CFT correspondence, even though everyone realizes that the simplifying assumption of anti de-sitter space is invalid for our universe). He does an excellent job of showing how you can do this and get back to the well known formulas under specific assumptions.
Again, you can not simply discard old theories of gravity wholesale. Whether you want to believe it or not, millions of students have verified the old theories with astonishing accuracy. They aren't all part of the cabal and lying to you. Geologists measure propagation of vibrations through the earth's mantle. If a large portion of the interior were hollow, it would be obvious. Now, there could be pockets that are hollow and hidden underground somehow escaping detection, but not the entire earth.
So yes, I will accept your offer. Please explain to me (using actual math) what exactly is the theory you are proposing, and importantly how it reduces to Einstein's well proven theory under specific, limiting assumptions.
This is all a wonderful opinion. But I don't see anything here that even remotely resembles a mathematical equation, or a theory that even reduces to a mathematical expression in any form.
I am all for exploring the spiritual side of humanity. However that does not remove the physical side of our existence. I am quite happy to consider any theory which genuinely advances the human condition.
But if you are asking if I trust your opinion or math more? I trust math. I am not allowing anyone to stay in power. I am just being human. Math is the language of our universe. If anyone is going to try and explain our physical reality, they need to become fluent in the language that defines it.
You are certainly welcome to your belief as well. But if you truly understand what you wrote above, then you will be able to translate that into a language the rest of us can understand and work with.
Another IS-BE hallucicopter.
https://files.catbox.moe/evxafz.mp4
You must not know much about "flat earth" if you'd rather consider this over that.
Normie-level FE is indeed a psyop, but how isn't HE? It glorifies the same nonsense that NASA and (((they))) want you to believe (aliens, "our precious earth", nukes, pole shifts, etc.).
70% probability the earth is flat