I watched maybe the first 10-12 minutes of the panel discussion and have say that your take on it seems quite accurate. K asks M a direct question and she circles around it with jargon and obfuscation, trying at times to pretend they're saying the same thing (which they're not - he's refuting her premise). The moderator is blatantly pro-narrative (pro Dr. M). I'll try to get back to it and watch the entire thing when I have more time. Thanks for the links.
The premise that Dr. Kaufman, Stefan Lanka, Tom Cowan and Sam & Mark Bailey is so simple; that all these "virologists" are playing with dead monkey kidney cells that are killed by the "cytopathic effect" of adding poisons (anti-biotics) to their "viral culture" toxic soup. Lanka proved it. The original guy who invented the "viral culturing" process (Jon Enders) blatantly admitted it in his seminal "Measles" paper in 1954 where his control experiment (no sick boy fluids) results were INDISTINGUISHABLE from their main experiment (where they DID add the fluids of the boy with measles).
And since 1954, virologists don't run "control experiments" any longer.
The newer computer-generated "viruses" are an even further obfuscation and abstraction into insane virtual reality. They aren't doing any "gene sequencing", where you start with an original strand of real DNA (like of a carrot, mouse, human, etc.) and then snip it up into pieces and insert other pieces of nucleic acids. Instead, they are doing "gene assembling" by taking the artifacts of a sick person's lung fluids and tissues, and literally piecing them together to make up some new "thing" (i.e. "SARS-COV2 Coronavirus"). It's pure fantasy and nonsense as their "new thing" doesn't exist in reality....only in their computer programs (Trinity & MegaHit).
Virologists are now literally inventing virtual reality "Frankensteins" on their computer screens to drive political policy. This is "virology" in a nutshell. 100% pseudoscience nonsense.
I watched maybe the first 10-12 minutes of the panel discussion and have say that your take on it seems quite accurate. K asks M a direct question and she circles around it with jargon and obfuscation, trying at times to pretend they're saying the same thing (which they're not - he's refuting her premise). The moderator is blatantly pro-narrative (pro Dr. M). I'll try to get back to it and watch the entire thing when I have more time. Thanks for the links.
Sure thing.
The premise that Dr. Kaufman, Stefan Lanka, Tom Cowan and Sam & Mark Bailey is so simple; that all these "virologists" are playing with dead monkey kidney cells that are killed by the "cytopathic effect" of adding poisons (anti-biotics) to their "viral culture" toxic soup. Lanka proved it. The original guy who invented the "viral culturing" process (Jon Enders) blatantly admitted it in his seminal "Measles" paper in 1954 where his control experiment (no sick boy fluids) results were INDISTINGUISHABLE from their main experiment (where they DID add the fluids of the boy with measles).
And since 1954, virologists don't run "control experiments" any longer.
The newer computer-generated "viruses" are an even further obfuscation and abstraction into insane virtual reality. They aren't doing any "gene sequencing", where you start with an original strand of real DNA (like of a carrot, mouse, human, etc.) and then snip it up into pieces and insert other pieces of nucleic acids. Instead, they are doing "gene assembling" by taking the artifacts of a sick person's lung fluids and tissues, and literally piecing them together to make up some new "thing" (i.e. "SARS-COV2 Coronavirus"). It's pure fantasy and nonsense as their "new thing" doesn't exist in reality....only in their computer programs (Trinity & MegaHit).
Virologists are now literally inventing virtual reality "Frankensteins" on their computer screens to drive political policy. This is "virology" in a nutshell. 100% pseudoscience nonsense.