All Q talk aside, we can all agree that we are in an information war.
Who is the primary audience? Who is the secondary audience? What communication tactics could he be using?
How is he specifically phrasing his response?
Refers to Q as "he" multiple times. Not a group of people, just as "he". Patel speaks about Q like someone he knows from the office. That's weird.
There are a lot of non Q communications talking about Trump possibly coming back before 2024, so for Kash to say that there is no mechanism in place to bring him back at the same time as Trump is winking and saying "sooner than you think"...well, it's odd. So it makes me want to dig a bit.
My theory is that Patel speaks like a lawyer. Word choice is very important.
No mechanism in place = there currently isn't a procedure to nullify an election / return power to person who really won. It's a gray area on what happens after Durham proves traitors / fraud.
People come up to me and ask what they can do and I say they can't do anything except to vote him back into office on 2024 = citizen action is limited to casting votes. He does not speak to other groups who have different rights to investigate such as different organizations in the justice system. Citizen action, according to the law really is limited to casting votes.
So the focus is on DA's and 2022 election = we need to replace all the Soros operatives in order for the Durham cases to proceed.
All Q talk aside, we can all agree that we are in an information war. Who is the primary audience? Who is the secondary audience? What communication tactics could he be using? How is he specifically phrasing his response?
Refers to Q as "he" multiple times. Not a group of people, just as "he". Patel speaks about Q like someone he knows from the office. That's weird.
There are a lot of non Q communications talking about Trump possibly coming back before 2024, so for Kash to say that there is no mechanism in place to bring him back at the same time as Trump is winking and saying "sooner than you think"...well, it's odd. So it makes me want to dig a bit.
My theory is that Patel speaks like a lawyer. Word choice is very important.
No mechanism in place = there currently isn't a procedure to nullify an election / return power to person who really won. It's a gray area on what happens after Durham proves traitors / fraud.
People come up to me and ask what they can do and I say they can't do anything except to vote him back into office on 2024 = citizen action is limited to casting votes. He does not speak to other groups who have different rights to investigate such as different organizations in the justice system. Citizen action, according to the law really is limited to casting votes.
So the focus is on DA's and 2022 election = we need to replace all the Soros operatives in order for the Durham cases to proceed.
Such a great comment!
They took over because they infiltrated the SoS positions at the state level and soros funded it!
That's the most powerful position in the state as far as voting is concerned.
Now we have to take the power back!