Julian Assange Extradition=GO!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (90)
sorted by:
I saw the video many times, from several angles. People don't wanna think for themselves I guess.
Ok, simple run down then. Yes there were armed security personnel behind her as well as in front of her, and she kept coming even as those armed people all told her to stop.
From the perspective of security... she was guilty of breaching security, she was carrying a backpack with unknown contents, she attempted to breach inner security even as she saw armed security telling her she would be shot if she kept coming. She kept coming - you have to hionor the threat. Was she gonna trigger a biological weapon, a labomba, pull our a bottle of urine and toss it around...?
They had to honor the threat she represented, based on ALL the facts of the moment.
Fact - she violated the Capitol, breached outer security.
Fact- she kept coming even as armed security warned her of mortal anger - WHY would a sane person do that? So the cops had to consider she had a Mission, an agenda, perhaps a weapon...
Yes, I would have shot her. If she broke into your house and then tried to break into your bedroom as you warned her not to you would shoot also, or should.
If we wish to be a nation which enjoys the Rule of Law we must respect and enforce Law. Everyone seems to want to emote rather than reason, but I am convinced- we are no longer a nation which desires the Rule of Law it seems.
https://files.catbox.moe/e4h2uj.jpg
Sorry you whole argument falls apart with one basic fact. The security behind her could have taken her down at any point. They had a better view of the situation. Shooting her should have been the last option NOT the first option. She pasted right by the three armed guards before she was shot. So this nonsense about her being a threat makes no sense. Otherwise they would have stopped her.
Even up to the point of her being shot they could have tackled her to the ground. They did not
the murderer who shot her shot into the direction of the other officers. How does that make sense?
all members of congress had already been moved to another location so why was it so important to shot her before the other security guys could tackle her if they needed to?
You don't tackle suspects who might be carrying a labomba.
But hey you convinced me, we no longer care about the Rule of Law.
Of course you don't, you just let them walk deeper into the building right?
No you don't let them walk deeper in, you stop them at the first barrier or shoot them as soon as you can afterwards...