It's a simple equation.
Imagine you're a NWO head.
The NWO ain't happening anymore. All your plans are on fire and in the process of being retailored just to keep you in some modicum of power...
So, it's back to the Status Quo -- Elites ruling over the Chattel.
The Woke agenda was supposed to destabilize the Nation, and that it did.
But you can't rule over ashes, though some of your comrades might wish to burn it all down on their way to hell.
You, on the other hand, want to go back to how things were; Presidents owned by special interests, Secret Societies keeping it low-key, corporate collusion kept the market in the hands of those who "deserve" it...
Just none of that End-Times Prophecy, Satanic bullshit and child trafficking.
You just want to go back to being a Wizard ruling secretly among the Muggles, with all the Voldemorts and Death-eaters left in a pile of ash.
So, what do you do when you look at the Global Birthrate Crisis you helped create, soon to be a complete collapse of humanity due to the "vaccine" depopulation agenda that only worked within a NWO reality, and is leading to the distinct likelihood all your investments into Bitcoin, Gold, Petro-Dollars, and other naked-shot market stocks are all going up in flames simultaneously and you'll be left penniless and hated by a ravenous mob of Frankenstein's monsters wanting revenge?
FUCKIN' HEEL-TURN!
Everyone was ready to let the bus roll down the cliff, but you had a change of heart once everyone started eating each-other alive. Now you gotta jump in and pump those brakes!
Issue Number 1, the Population.
You gotta reverse the damage done. You gotta get people fuckin' and raising families that don't die, aren't criminals, and will work in your slave mills.
The Agenda now is as follows:
- Ban Abortion
- Ban Contraceptives
- Ban Prostitution
- Ban Single-Sex Schools
- Discourage College and University for Women
- Villainize Same-Sex Couples for contributing to the "Birthrate Crisis"
- Ban Transgenderism and Drag
- Ban Topless Bars and Night Clubs
- Removal of all Woke and "Love is Love" Corporate Propaganda.
- Restrict Simping, such as Thots, Titty-Streamers and Only-Fans on the Internet
- Crack-down on Catfishing
- Restrict Pornography like Japan does, where everything requires censor bars and blurring.
- Teach Sex-Ed in schools at younger and younger ages, with increase focus on encouraging reproductive habits over gratification.
- Set up dating centers around the US
- Ban Tinder, Grindr, and all other "Hook-up" apps.
- Offer completely free Dating Sites (that work and aren't 10% narcissist women, 90% thirsty men), subsidized by tax monies.
- Increase tax-breaks for families with more than 2 children.
- Encourage young women (even minors) to have sex and get married younger.
- Encourage a culture of "promise rings"
- Pay men to marry ugly women.
- Bring back Boy Bands to get young girls attracted to men.
- Push IDOLs, like Britney Spears and those in Japan to get men horny for young/cute over glamour/punk so they can start popping out babies sooner.
Anything and everything that might detract from a population boom MUST GO!
Now, from a Conservative perspective, much of this would be a "YES, PLEASE!" platform. That's the selling-point.
In reality, it's only done to encourage baby-making; not because the nuclear family is valuable; not because it's morally correct; not because it's a Christian thing to do...
No... It's specifically because there is shortage in supply.
You need cattle to be a rancher. If the cattle are sparse, you need to horny them up and incentivize baby-making, not just sex.
Why is this a problem for us Patriots and Anons?
Because it's deceptive and potent. Because it builds upon a moral framework, but goes too far. The heel-turn will be from Radical Authoritarian Liberalism to Radical Authoritarian Conservativism, and it will happen at the drop of a hat with thunderous applause. Our applause.
Some things should be banned, I agree. Other things CANNOT be banned, and will only lead to people being incarcerated for so much as drawing nude anime girls online -- not because pornography is wrong morally, but because:
"The Government has declared you cannot do that. The Science says it does not support a breeding culture. You must breed for the Greater Good™. Obey."
For me, personally, the motive in pushing these bans matters, even if it is the morally correct decision. Over-Enforcement and Control has always been the issue. We shouldn't trade one set of Authoritarian Dictates for another.
We should, instead, ban Authoritarian Dictates and simply incentivize good behavior.
PS... It's happening right now. They're going to toss "Gender Studies" under the bus. My wager is before the end of September. RINOs will lead the way, so they can get in on the ground floor of the Conservative Authoritarianism.
How about not at all. We are uhhh... not sure when babies are babies but it is okay to kill up to 12 week old babies in the womb because we aren't sure. If you and they don't know then how about not at all.
The reasonable mark is not at all. No abortions.
If you think 6-12 weeks is reasonable than you aren't any better than those who think a baby can be killed at 18 weeks or 24 weeks or during partial birth abortions.
I agree with you when you say it is murder, plain and simple.
(Forgive me if I completely am misreading your post but if you are in favor of 6-12 week abortions than disregard this apology).
So extreme hypothetical, force a 12 year old girl to carry her brother-cousin from her uncle? Force a 25 year old to bring a product of rape to term? Force a woman having severe complications to attempt to carry for the full 9 months, resulting in her and the baby's death at 7 months?
I'm not on board with a complete ban and I'm not on board with infanticide. But you need the exceptions for extenuating circumstances.
I do not favor it nor am I against it entirely. It's based on research such as when a heartbeat is detected at 6 weeks and brain waves around 12. It's also during this time that the body can still self terminate for whatever reason. So with those facts to consider that can only be weighed against interpretation of the Bible, I cannot logically or in good conscious oppose the idea outright. I also take issue with the fact women don't know when they are pregnant, at least not right away which to me comes off as a design flaw.
Ultimately the problem comes to a head when you realize that banning abortion will have the same effect as banning guns: it won't stop the criminals. So instead I believe the pro life approach is to help facilitate society shifting to be more pro life. But that starts with the movement becoming more pro life as well. As is it is, being "pro life" is just right wing wokeism. Most that claim to be such also shill for the status quo of a society that is extremely anti life and anti family. The second the maternity leave conversation comes up, suddenly it's the "I don't want to pay for that! I earned that money!" so now it's no longer pro life, you value your money more than life itself.
SO yeah. Unless you are helping to make society better, to reduce the burden of childcare to help build a pro life society you're gonna have to accept the 6-12 week compromise. Ideally I would rather there be no abortions too, however since I have actually listened to people, since I have seen firsthand how much this society hates kids, using the government isn't the way to go about it. A preferred scenario is one where people CAN choose abortion, but feel no desire to. The law does not shape morality.