Satanists (KM, Rothschilds, name stealers) have infiltrated the following:
- Israel/Zionists (research Netanyahu and his family; also Kissinger, Schwab backgrounds)
- Catholic Church (research the Pope, his WW2 background, Jesuits, images of Vatican auditorium that look like serpent)
- Saudi Arabia (research House of Saud and their true origin, as well as the massive human trafficking that was going on in SA until 2017)
- Church of England (research infiltration by Catholics as punishment for breakaway; see UK Royals direct involvement in changes)
- Protestant Church (research infiltration by Catholics as punishment for breakaway and Megachurch pastors involvement in pedophilia)
- Mormon Church (research Mitt Romney and his ties to Ukraine; also research current Mormon Church leadership and look at infiltration going on in Utah)
I know who you are referring to. However, the word 'Jew' has been intermingled with the words 'Israelite', 'Judahite', 'Judean', 'pharisee', and 'Edomite' for over 400 years. It's use in the Bible is ambiguous and unfortunately needs to be deciphered for every verse that it is used. Some times it refers to the Roman province of Judea, other times it refers more accurately to Edomites. Other times it references 'Israelites". Your example provides a 4th reference to the 'Name Stealers' of Khazaria. Nevertheless, these references here are indeed very distinctly different.
The word Jew is an English word originally referring to those Eastern European people who spoke Yiddish. Even the Yiddish people did not view themselves as Israelites. The word 'Jew' did not exist during the Roman times. Rome referred to the region as 'Judea' and those people of the region as 'Judeans'. Even Pontius Pilate inscribed a title in Latin on the torture stake that read - "Jesus the Nazerene King of the Judeans".
Originally they were just called Hebrew which simply meant " crossed over".
Jew is relatively modern
The word Hebrew derives from Eber, who was a great-grandson of Noah 's son Shem. Hebrew is the language Eber spoke.
Tewdryg:
I would like to catch up to my lack of knowledge of this subject.
Would you expand on your understanding of the topic (explained in your own works) and/or point to sources for more info?
thx
Don't waste your time studying the nation of Israel and those who falsely claim their inheritance. Study Jesus Christ instead. Then you will know everything.
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/
A very narrow viewpoint?
There is a reason why the history of the nation of Israel leading up to the advent of Christ is included in the bible.
But perhaps you are referring to the modern nation of Israel. In that case, I concur.
Once Israel failed to recognize and receive Christ, the blessing that God had given to them was transferred to the Christian 'nation' (a nation in spirit, not in geography); parable of the vineyard.
Not narrow at all. Jesus Christ is the pivot point in history. Until him, Satan did what he wanted.
I think Paul would beg to differ. Romans 11:25-29 - 25 I do not want you to be ignorant of this mystery, brothers and sisters, so that you may not be conceited: Israel has experienced a hardening in part until the full number of the Gentiles has come in, 26 and in this way all Israel will be saved. As it is written: “The deliverer will come from Zion; he will turn godlessness away from Jacob. 27 And this is my covenant with them when I take away their sins.” 28 As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies for your sake; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs, 29 for God’s gifts and his call are irrevocable.
Believing gentiles are grafted in - added - they do not replace.
Biblical Israel and the modern nationstate Israel are polar opposites.
Quite right. The Latin term "Judea" described this Roman province. Prior to this the Greeks called this region 'Idumea', which means -- land of the Edomites. Since the conquest of Nebuchadnezzar, the predominant population was Babylon's ally the Edomite. They were rewarded the spoils of war and the vacated land of Judah. King Herod himself was an Edomite. The cultural mores of that time dictated that one does not rise to power unless they were of kinship of the population. The temple itself was referred to as "Herod's temple" because Herod heavily contributed to it. In 66 CE, when the Roman general Vespasian swept into Jerusalem, Judaism was a cultic, oral religion, with Herod's massive temple as its lodestar. Everything happened in the temple complex. Even today, Judaism is 95% Pharisaism.
The above epitomized what Jesus experienced earlier. During the blessed time of Jesus, Pharisaism was a cultic, oral religion, with Herod's massive temple as its lodestar. Everything happened in the temple complex. The temple did not represent God's truth (much like we are seeing today in many Christian churches). However, the rites and sacrifices made in the temple were blasphemous to God. What were these transgressions to which the massive temple was utterly destroyed, in which Flavius Josephus recorded that it was erased and no one could tell it ever existed? He himself as a boy went to the temple and grew up there.
The Israelites during Jesus' time were actually a very small minority and most of them settled in the area of the Sea of Galilee.
Most Christians don't realize Judaism is a newer religion than Christianity is and Christianity has NEVER been based on Judaism. This is a inconvenient truth and publicly a taboo subject. Believe it or not, Judaism was created to confront the spread of Christianity - using the Bible as a prop and also to conceal Judaism's ritualistic practice of blood-letting. The proof is of course in writing and can be found in Judaism's foundational Passover text.
Judaism's foundational Passover text is not from the Old Testament but rather the Haggadah, a thoroughly Talmudic work. (M. Hoffman III, "Judaism Discovered"). The Talmud was compiled as a result of the absolute destruction of Herod’s temple, in which every stone was carried away leaving no trace of it’s existence. In it we learn:
In 70 CE, Vespasian's son Titus razed the massive temple to the ground. A quote from the Talmud:
"Where was God under the rubble?" wondered the Rabbis. "How to praise him now that the temple was gone?" The sages agreed: Jews would have to BECOME a people of the book, or they would disappear.
Hence, they were NOT a people of the book before this time.
Jesus work was always concerning the Israelites. "But because you are not My sheep, you refuse to believe. 27 My sheep listen to My voice; I know them, and they follow Me." -- John 10:26-27
He answered, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” -- Matthew 15:24
I'm not quite sure of the specific question you're asking. Could you clarify?
the term Jew referred to those who lived in the town of Judea, that's what they were called, the word ''Jew'' was not about religion or believers at that time.
God protects Israel, the words don't exactly say that he protects only the Jews.