I had a couple of Mormons (the two guys in suits on bicycles) come to my home years ago. They finally gave up and left, as I had actually read the Book of Mormon and pointed out things they had no answer for.
I wish I had known then that the Book of Mormon was plagiarized from a popular history book that was written a few years before.
Ah yes. "View of the Hebrews" by Ethan Smith. The similarities are obvious. I've discussed it at length with a couple of mormon buddies. One is a strong believer, the other is more open. But both agree it raises serious questions.
Regarding religious texts, I've read a couple versions of the Bible, I've read The Book of Mormon, and read translations of the Torah, I've read the I ching... But despite of multiple attempts, I've never managed to read the Quran. I've tried. It just reads like bad poetry. Maybe I should learn Arabic to really appreciate it, I dunno.
Next on my list is the Pali cannon.. That might take a while (understatement of the year, lol) . Luckily I often have periods of downtime at the night job. Good reading and study time.
If someone is a real truth seeker and lover of books, I can always find common ground, regardless of their political or religious persuasions. I figure if we are REALLY looking for unbiased truth - truth you can test - and we're not just trying to reinforce what we already believe, we will eventually end up in the same place. I can work with that.
I'd never heard of the Hebrews book. What I was referring to was "The late war, between the United States and Great Britain, from June 1812, to February 1815: written in the ancient historical style" by Gilbert J. Hunt, published in 1816, well before the Book of Mormon. I've read an extensive article somewhere that pointed out the raft of plagiarisms from it.
I turned to a random page to get a sample. On page 71, it says:
"26 And they became merry with the drinking of wine; after which they departed and went unto a house of mirth and gaiety.
27 Now, it is written in the words of Solomon, who wisdom hath not been excelled, that, there is a time to weep, and a time to rejoice.
28 Not many days after those things, it came to pass, that the hearts of the lords and the counsellors of Britain were rejoiced."
The biggest strike against the Book of Mormon was the fact that Smith wrote it in 1600s English instead of current 1800s English, like it would have been if it were a true translation from the "golden plates."
I had a couple of Mormons (the two guys in suits on bicycles) come to my home years ago. They finally gave up and left, as I had actually read the Book of Mormon and pointed out things they had no answer for.
I wish I had known then that the Book of Mormon was plagiarized from a popular history book that was written a few years before.
Ah yes. "View of the Hebrews" by Ethan Smith. The similarities are obvious. I've discussed it at length with a couple of mormon buddies. One is a strong believer, the other is more open. But both agree it raises serious questions.
Regarding religious texts, I've read a couple versions of the Bible, I've read The Book of Mormon, and read translations of the Torah, I've read the I ching... But despite of multiple attempts, I've never managed to read the Quran. I've tried. It just reads like bad poetry. Maybe I should learn Arabic to really appreciate it, I dunno.
Next on my list is the Pali cannon.. That might take a while (understatement of the year, lol) . Luckily I often have periods of downtime at the night job. Good reading and study time.
If someone is a real truth seeker and lover of books, I can always find common ground, regardless of their political or religious persuasions. I figure if we are REALLY looking for unbiased truth - truth you can test - and we're not just trying to reinforce what we already believe, we will eventually end up in the same place. I can work with that.
Peace mate!
I'd never heard of the Hebrews book. What I was referring to was "The late war, between the United States and Great Britain, from June 1812, to February 1815: written in the ancient historical style" by Gilbert J. Hunt, published in 1816, well before the Book of Mormon. I've read an extensive article somewhere that pointed out the raft of plagiarisms from it.
You can read the book here: https://archive.org/details/latewarbetween_00hunt/mode/2up
I turned to a random page to get a sample. On page 71, it says:
"26 And they became merry with the drinking of wine; after which they departed and went unto a house of mirth and gaiety. 27 Now, it is written in the words of Solomon, who wisdom hath not been excelled, that, there is a time to weep, and a time to rejoice. 28 Not many days after those things, it came to pass, that the hearts of the lords and the counsellors of Britain were rejoiced."
The biggest strike against the Book of Mormon was the fact that Smith wrote it in 1600s English instead of current 1800s English, like it would have been if it were a true translation from the "golden plates."