Uh oh, looks like some shenanigans are going on.
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (40)
sorted by:
Thanks for being vigilant anon. Never hurts to check ourselves.
Wow, just wow! Had never considered this but what if it is the Q team communicating with GEOTUS, asking him if he's ready to serve again. And he responded. If the markers have been met for military action it would make sense Q is back communicating.
This... Actually makes sense!! Especially considering the exact delta reference to Roe v. Wade & what else it contained: https://greatawakening.win/p/15IXkicVqF/check-out-this-exact-time-match-/c/
"Potus is currently evaluating options re: EO."
Executive Order 13848: Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-13848-imposing-certain-sanctions-the-event-foreign-interference-united
..."foreign person" or entity being the Corporation of the United States (DC Swamp), interfering in the election of the Constitutional Republic.
...And who else would have access to TOR on Q board? Q Post 326 & Post 4 "Potus is 100% insulated."
But look what else I found in Post 4:
Spez: MORE CRUMBS: If 11.3/US113 is first marker (Post 25 & 26), look ahead in DOD Law of War Manual 11.5 & 11.6: Occupiers are responsible to ensure the laws of the country (not occupier's laws) are in force and that the rights and humane treatment of the population is protected.
https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/DoD%20Law%20of%20War%20Manual%20-%20June%202015%20Updated%20Dec%202016.pdf?ver=2016-12-13-172036-190
What did the earlier delta from today make reference to? Children. OUR Children and their RIGHTS to LIFE under attack by the occupying swamp. Q frames it as murder, and murder is not humane treatment of the occupied population.
There are always two sides to war, and both must abide by law. I always interpreted the application of this law of war as the swamp occupying us, and if that's the case, the swamp is and has been violating internationally recognized law in committing actual, legally recognized war crimes. No doubt Russia will play a big role in recognizing this (as well as the Ukraine biolabs and other wtf-ery) internationally. I'm sure it's been preplanned in talks with Putin. And what happens when a belligerent force violates these? MILITARY TRIBUNALS.
Alternatively, this could be seen as whitehats occupying blackhats, and whitehats are enforcing US constitution as required by law of war, but seeing as the blackhats have been caught red-handed & are illegitimate, the aforementioned interpretation makes more sense.
A thought: What if Russia participates in these tribunals? Our own military enforcing capital punishment for treason to former presidents under the rule of current Presidents would set a very bad precedent for the future--It would open up a pandora's box of political rivalry turned witchhunt execution. But what if Russia handles US former officials/presidents in their own military tribunals for their participation in acts of war against Russia via Ukraine & other globalist schemes? No bad precedent & the job's done. I think Russia will end up being our partner in taking out the rot in both countries & globally.
Puzzle pieces are starting to connect.
Awesome observation! You made something click for me! Wish I could updoot many more times!
I guess we should be looking to see if Trump responds in comms
Supposedly only Q can use TOR, as I have been told by a member here. ID 000000 is always TOR, and that number by it is how many posts an ID has made in the thread.
Not doubting you, but where did you get the "only Q can use TOR" from? I assume that you mean only use TOR on 4Chan.
I'm not a regular 4Chan user.
Individual board owners, on 8Kun at least, can enable or disable TOR for either the entire board or individual users. On QR, it was disabled for everyone but Q for a long time, but apparently is has been re-enabled due to people not being able to use the board. Sounds fishy to me, but I am not in charge of these things.
Thanks for that.
Could that be Q+ posting using TOR?
I like the way you think!
I do not know.
And I read it “save this country again” …. Kek
“Serve” this country again
"Throw us a bone Q, we’ve all been waiting for what seemed like an eternity.What’s going on?"
That's what post 4956 was responding to.
Shit, MB, Q alerts app still had that B post.
I want to up vote, but it's on 17.
All the numbers on the board are flagged anons that Q flagged. Who knows who all they are. That's not Qs post, its an anon he flagged.
What's the meaning of the 0s?
See my comment there, Speedy Gonzolas. :p
Ooh I see, kek! I'm too excited. So Q is also posting "anonymously" or is that supposed to be someone else within Q, perhaps?
There could be some else there. I am not 100% certain if the chan board software differentiates between different TOR browsers. I just know it always gives 000000 for the ID. That's how one knows it's TOR.
I gotcha. Good catch! Let's see what happens next !
That post is on 8kun, yes?
Yes.
Isn’t this an anon’s response to Q’s “Are you ready to serve your country again” post?
That's what we're unsure of. See those six zeros in a row? Normally there is an alphanumeric sequence right there (not to be confused with the trip code). That's an 'ID', sort of like a temporary screen name for each individual poster, though changes with each thread. (Like, I may get GF5hyM in one thread and 5rFg7B in the next) When someone uses TOR, it always shows up as 000000. The numbers next to an ID is how many posts that particular poster has made in the thread. Q is supposed to be the only person that can use TOR, so the implication is Q sock puppeting (also called 'samefagging' in the chan circles) in the thread, given only Q can use TOR and there is a (2) by the 000000 ID.
You win best explanation.🏆. Thanks so much.
Furthermore, it's been discovered that while in a thread, you will see 000000, but if you hover your mouse over an external link to a post, you will see an actual alphanumeric ID, though I do not know if those IDs are always the same for any and all TOR users.
Also, TOR has been turned on for everyone, not just Q, which opens the door to further questions. This may not really even be Q/Qteam, though I personally am not convinced of that just yet. Best to just wait and see how this plays out. There was some discussion previously about a possible delta suggesting a Q&A on a Saturday.
Well that’s certainly interesting. So the tor capability isn’t tied to the trip? Meaning if Q is using tor which is permitted only to his trip, he wouldn’t show up as anon?
Reading further seems to indicate that is has indeed been turned on for everyone.
Disregard this thread I guess, it sucks cocks. D:
Zero marker?
Maybe, but doubt it. It is just something that the board software does that for TOR users, instead of writing an alphanumeric sequence there.
😻🙏🏻