What if the content of R_v_W isn't as significant as we think and it's moreso about states rights getting a SCOTUS precedent? I know some things are happening in AZ and TX where the GOP is rejecting the 2020 results so maybe this entire ruling was just to give more legal ammo to the states when they start challenging the results of 2020. That would explain why RvW gets the ball rolling finally and is the 113 marker. "Once 11.3 verifies as 1st marker" and why it "had to be this way". States rights needed to be brought to the fore before the election can be corrected.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (69)
sorted by:
We do not need to have a convention of States. If we had one of those then all bets are off. you can bet the bill of rights will be mostly gone.
"We do not need to have a convention of States."
You're right. If one were held, you can bet that the delegates would mainly be selected by local democrat machine organizations.
I thought that was a Constitutional Convention, or are they the same?