Is that what I said? I said the opposite. This is what I said:
If you think there is something there, then you will have to provide actual evidence
The OP provides zero evidence. Literally nothing. The Babyfist story is not known by many (including myself). To think that the evidence is self-evident is... not evident.
Ignoring the actual evidence is unreasonable.
As I said, no evidence was being presented.
Ignoring the fact that the chans themselves called it out and posts about it are being deleted on the chans, is the equivelant to putting your head in the sand.
This is evidence, but it was not presented. Having said that, this is not good evidence. This is still in the realm of speculation, unless "the chans themselves" are providing actual evidence and not just "consensus".
Consensus is not in any way "truth." The number of people believing a thing does not in any way suggest anything except that a bunch of people have a shared belief. That belief can come from anywhere. The creation of false consensus beliefs under the guise of "on our side" is the primary function of Controlled Opposition which is everywhere. Last year more than the majority of the people in the world believed that the vaccine was the path to saving the world. Did that make it true?
NEVER will I hide my head in the sand. I demand evidence for speculative claims, and that is all I did in my post.
Visit the chans yourself and see.
Please provide a link to actual evidence (or posts that provide it). I am not well versed in navigation of the chans. I have looked at evidence presented there many times from others links, but when trying to investigate myself there, I tend to get lost in the weeds.
That is from 8kun, just a different link. I read it on 8kun. Now they have their politics too but a hack did occur several months ago.
I dont know all the ins and outs of the board. I know a lot of anons are excited and digging again because of the posts.
I know the anons who are asking for deltas and more proof are getting hammered as shills.
I think we all have learned to question everything and search it out. So what is the harm in being cautious? It doesn't change status of past Q posts or the reasons we need to fight back or the lies we have uncovered and the truths we have found.
Is that what I said? I said the opposite. This is what I said:
The OP provides zero evidence. Literally nothing. The Babyfist story is not known by many (including myself). To think that the evidence is self-evident is... not evident.
As I said, no evidence was being presented.
This is evidence, but it was not presented. Having said that, this is not good evidence. This is still in the realm of speculation, unless "the chans themselves" are providing actual evidence and not just "consensus".
Consensus is not in any way "truth." The number of people believing a thing does not in any way suggest anything except that a bunch of people have a shared belief. That belief can come from anywhere. The creation of false consensus beliefs under the guise of "on our side" is the primary function of Controlled Opposition which is everywhere. Last year more than the majority of the people in the world believed that the vaccine was the path to saving the world. Did that make it true?
NEVER will I hide my head in the sand. I demand evidence for speculative claims, and that is all I did in my post.
Please provide a link to actual evidence (or posts that provide it). I am not well versed in navigation of the chans. I have looked at evidence presented there many times from others links, but when trying to investigate myself there, I tend to get lost in the weeds.
You didn't ask me but u/ThePatriotsParty provided it.
https://imgur.io/a/J22HBR7
That is from 8kun, just a different link. I read it on 8kun. Now they have their politics too but a hack did occur several months ago.
I dont know all the ins and outs of the board. I know a lot of anons are excited and digging again because of the posts.
I know the anons who are asking for deltas and more proof are getting hammered as shills.
I think we all have learned to question everything and search it out. So what is the harm in being cautious? It doesn't change status of past Q posts or the reasons we need to fight back or the lies we have uncovered and the truths we have found.
Thank you very much.
Yw. We are all in this together