While I agree that nothing should be trusted, having doubts that are unreasonable does not aid in sound decision making. You have presented "doubts" that I do not consider reasonable.
To start, if Q can be compromised in such a way as to have fake posts, without an immediate official Q statement proving such, then either:
Q never had control, which is to say, Q is not MI and/or has no real power AKA Q is a LARP
Q has been removed as a player, no longer has control, and we are rightly FUBAR.
It is ludicrous to think that a Q in control would allow for unauthorized Q posts without immediately letting the world know that the trip code was compromised.
Your "evidence" of Scavino:
I'm not 100% sure who Baby Fist is but from what I understand, it was the name of someone that was able to dupe some anons into thinking it was Q
This is a line of nothing. If you think there is something there, then you will have to provide actual evidence and not pure speculation based on literally nothing.
Your "evidence" of Watkins:
Literally nothing Watkins says or does has any relevance to anything Q. Ron Watkins is at best a random Anon, just like the rest of us, and at worst Controlled Opposition. WHATEVER he posts, anywhere, at any time, cannot be used as "proof" of anything.
Skepticism is healthy, even essential, and should never be removed from the investigative process. I suggest that nothing should ever be trusted, as it is the opposite of Critical Thinking. Having said that, doubts must be reasonable (i.e. based on reason) and not barely coherent "I think I heard a rumor once." Creating such speculative doubts only detracts from investigation.
I dont see it as unreasonable to consider that Babyfist had 2 years to sift through and find the code and for some reason whitelist it, making it less secure, then repost old Qposts to increase traffic. Ignoring everything around this is unreasonable. Ignoring the actual evidence is unreasonable. Ignoring the fact that the chans themselves called it out and posts about it are being deleted on the chans, is the equivelant to putting your head in the sand.
Visit the chans yourself and see. This is not speculation or rumor. Its esentially proven this was a larp. The BO had 2 years to figure out and use the trip. Not saying he had it the whole time, but 2 years checking logs to get the trip is not out of this world imaginable.
This dont mean Q was/is a larp. But someone else now has the ability to post as Q. At the very least it should be considered compromised at this point.
Is that what I said? I said the opposite. This is what I said:
If you think there is something there, then you will have to provide actual evidence
The OP provides zero evidence. Literally nothing. The Babyfist story is not known by many (including myself). To think that the evidence is self-evident is... not evident.
Ignoring the actual evidence is unreasonable.
As I said, no evidence was being presented.
Ignoring the fact that the chans themselves called it out and posts about it are being deleted on the chans, is the equivelant to putting your head in the sand.
This is evidence, but it was not presented. Having said that, this is not good evidence. This is still in the realm of speculation, unless "the chans themselves" are providing actual evidence and not just "consensus".
Consensus is not in any way "truth." The number of people believing a thing does not in any way suggest anything except that a bunch of people have a shared belief. That belief can come from anywhere. The creation of false consensus beliefs under the guise of "on our side" is the primary function of Controlled Opposition which is everywhere. Last year more than the majority of the people in the world believed that the vaccine was the path to saving the world. Did that make it true?
NEVER will I hide my head in the sand. I demand evidence for speculative claims, and that is all I did in my post.
Visit the chans yourself and see.
Please provide a link to actual evidence (or posts that provide it). I am not well versed in navigation of the chans. I have looked at evidence presented there many times from others links, but when trying to investigate myself there, I tend to get lost in the weeds.
That is from 8kun, just a different link. I read it on 8kun. Now they have their politics too but a hack did occur several months ago.
I dont know all the ins and outs of the board. I know a lot of anons are excited and digging again because of the posts.
I know the anons who are asking for deltas and more proof are getting hammered as shills.
I think we all have learned to question everything and search it out. So what is the harm in being cautious? It doesn't change status of past Q posts or the reasons we need to fight back or the lies we have uncovered and the truths we have found.
While I agree that nothing should be trusted, having doubts that are unreasonable does not aid in sound decision making. You have presented "doubts" that I do not consider reasonable.
To start, if Q can be compromised in such a way as to have fake posts, without an immediate official Q statement proving such, then either:
It is ludicrous to think that a Q in control would allow for unauthorized Q posts without immediately letting the world know that the trip code was compromised.
Your "evidence" of Scavino:
This is a line of nothing. If you think there is something there, then you will have to provide actual evidence and not pure speculation based on literally nothing.
Your "evidence" of Watkins:
Literally nothing Watkins says or does has any relevance to anything Q. Ron Watkins is at best a random Anon, just like the rest of us, and at worst Controlled Opposition. WHATEVER he posts, anywhere, at any time, cannot be used as "proof" of anything.
Skepticism is healthy, even essential, and should never be removed from the investigative process. I suggest that nothing should ever be trusted, as it is the opposite of Critical Thinking. Having said that, doubts must be reasonable (i.e. based on reason) and not barely coherent "I think I heard a rumor once." Creating such speculative doubts only detracts from investigation.
I dont see it as unreasonable to consider that Babyfist had 2 years to sift through and find the code and for some reason whitelist it, making it less secure, then repost old Qposts to increase traffic. Ignoring everything around this is unreasonable. Ignoring the actual evidence is unreasonable. Ignoring the fact that the chans themselves called it out and posts about it are being deleted on the chans, is the equivelant to putting your head in the sand.
Visit the chans yourself and see. This is not speculation or rumor. Its esentially proven this was a larp. The BO had 2 years to figure out and use the trip. Not saying he had it the whole time, but 2 years checking logs to get the trip is not out of this world imaginable.
This dont mean Q was/is a larp. But someone else now has the ability to post as Q. At the very least it should be considered compromised at this point.
Not considering it is a disservice.
Is that what I said? I said the opposite. This is what I said:
The OP provides zero evidence. Literally nothing. The Babyfist story is not known by many (including myself). To think that the evidence is self-evident is... not evident.
As I said, no evidence was being presented.
This is evidence, but it was not presented. Having said that, this is not good evidence. This is still in the realm of speculation, unless "the chans themselves" are providing actual evidence and not just "consensus".
Consensus is not in any way "truth." The number of people believing a thing does not in any way suggest anything except that a bunch of people have a shared belief. That belief can come from anywhere. The creation of false consensus beliefs under the guise of "on our side" is the primary function of Controlled Opposition which is everywhere. Last year more than the majority of the people in the world believed that the vaccine was the path to saving the world. Did that make it true?
NEVER will I hide my head in the sand. I demand evidence for speculative claims, and that is all I did in my post.
Please provide a link to actual evidence (or posts that provide it). I am not well versed in navigation of the chans. I have looked at evidence presented there many times from others links, but when trying to investigate myself there, I tend to get lost in the weeds.
You didn't ask me but u/ThePatriotsParty provided it.
https://imgur.io/a/J22HBR7
That is from 8kun, just a different link. I read it on 8kun. Now they have their politics too but a hack did occur several months ago.
I dont know all the ins and outs of the board. I know a lot of anons are excited and digging again because of the posts.
I know the anons who are asking for deltas and more proof are getting hammered as shills.
I think we all have learned to question everything and search it out. So what is the harm in being cautious? It doesn't change status of past Q posts or the reasons we need to fight back or the lies we have uncovered and the truths we have found.
Thank you very much.
This should be its own post. Would love to see you get out in front of all the illogical thinking going on by expanding on this. Great response.