Horse crap. I was able to look at it and see what it's saying immediately; I was not mislead by the visual - in fact I did not notice it until you pointed it out.
I have written many such science reports (and read many thousands). There are even classes on exactly this topic in both graduate and undergraduate science education. Just because you saw it one way and don't feel mislead by it, doesn't in any way mean what I said is false.
Meh. I get his point but it's not so extreme as originally stated. Anyone with a brain can look at the chart and not be dramatically mislead. It's not "the worst form of propaganda" FFS.
Sure, I did that. I shouldn't have. That wasn't the real point however, which you completely ignored in calling me out on that.
The real point was that YOU do not speak for everyone. YOUR reaction didn't in any way refute a single thing I said. The REALITY is that there are classes on this exact topic as a way to reduce lies in science reporting. Because even though YOU didn't have that problem, it is such a common problem, there are classes to try to reduce it's occurrence.
Horse crap. I was able to look at it and see what it's saying immediately; I was not mislead by the visual - in fact I did not notice it until you pointed it out.
I have written many such science reports (and read many thousands). There are even classes on exactly this topic in both graduate and undergraduate science education. Just because you saw it one way and don't feel mislead by it, doesn't in any way mean what I said is false.
Thank you for lording over us with your "qualifications."
slyver is 💯 on this. Your anecdotal exception proves the rule.
Im no slyver shill either lol
Meh. I get his point but it's not so extreme as originally stated. Anyone with a brain can look at the chart and not be dramatically mislead. It's not "the worst form of propaganda" FFS.
I can attest to that!
HAHA
Sure, I did that. I shouldn't have. That wasn't the real point however, which you completely ignored in calling me out on that.
The real point was that YOU do not speak for everyone. YOUR reaction didn't in any way refute a single thing I said. The REALITY is that there are classes on this exact topic as a way to reduce lies in science reporting. Because even though YOU didn't have that problem, it is such a common problem, there are classes to try to reduce it's occurrence.
It's = it is