I'm sorry, didnt mean to confuse you, Dave was more an example, it could be anyone really.
The point was that the thought someone is posting Q posts for the purposes of ad revenue was idiotic at best, and feeble 3 letter agency attempts to cause confusion and chaos at worst. Regardless of which it turns out to be, it's not worth spending any more time on that topic.
Dave has been going for years speaking matter of factly about conjecture. He states things that are guesses as factual happenings and for years has been raking in money from advertisers.
I get you need income from content to be able to produce it, but the way Dave mentions conjecture as fact, knowing what we want to hear, bothers me.
I much prefer "red pill news" who comments on actual events, posits theories for explanations, has stellar interviews, and doesn't try to pass off guesses as facts.
While I'm not arguing with you (YOU actually have a valid point, although I disagree), what you say is moot for the discussion.
I don't believe Dave, or any other red piller would go so far as to impersonate Q just to generate ad revenue. It is asinine and idiotic to believe, and the very concept comes from shills who don't understand what the movement is or where it comes from or what it believes.
Oh, I don't believe someone impersonated q with the tripcode and everything for revenue.
If it was impersonated, it was for the intent of sowing disagreement and chaos, not revenue.
That I agree with you on.
Whether it really was Q or not, idk. The lengths people go to to disprove it seem kinda shaky to me though. Feels like when you have an intention and will go to the end of the world to back it up, just because.
I'm sorry, didnt mean to confuse you, Dave was more an example, it could be anyone really.
The point was that the thought someone is posting Q posts for the purposes of ad revenue was idiotic at best, and feeble 3 letter agency attempts to cause confusion and chaos at worst. Regardless of which it turns out to be, it's not worth spending any more time on that topic.
Dave has been going for years speaking matter of factly about conjecture. He states things that are guesses as factual happenings and for years has been raking in money from advertisers.
I get you need income from content to be able to produce it, but the way Dave mentions conjecture as fact, knowing what we want to hear, bothers me.
I much prefer "red pill news" who comments on actual events, posits theories for explanations, has stellar interviews, and doesn't try to pass off guesses as facts.
While I'm not arguing with you (YOU actually have a valid point, although I disagree), what you say is moot for the discussion.
I don't believe Dave, or any other red piller would go so far as to impersonate Q just to generate ad revenue. It is asinine and idiotic to believe, and the very concept comes from shills who don't understand what the movement is or where it comes from or what it believes.
Oh, I don't believe someone impersonated q with the tripcode and everything for revenue.
If it was impersonated, it was for the intent of sowing disagreement and chaos, not revenue.
That I agree with you on.
Whether it really was Q or not, idk. The lengths people go to to disprove it seem kinda shaky to me though. Feels like when you have an intention and will go to the end of the world to back it up, just because.
If this new Q says something that could trigger a Red Flag law ... it may be too late for you ...