Let me ask you a hypothetical. What if it turns out that "Chemtrails" are real. This is just a hypothetical, I'm not going to post on the mountains of evidence to support it. If it is real, and an active play against We The People, isn't such censorship harming people? Don't we need to know? Maybe if it is real, we can find ways of reducing the damage it does to our lives. There is no way to know if the topic is silenced.
Now let's say its not real, how can we know if we aren't allowed to debate the evidence? HOW CAN WE KNOW???
If the debate is silenced, we can't really understand the full agenda of the Cabal. We can't really understand what it is we need to focus on, and fight against. Censorship of dissenting topics never aids in an investigation into the Truth.
If it's on Q, and if Q were to direct us to take it seriously and talk about it, it would be all over this WIN.
Still waiting for info on how the chemtrail team somehow covers the skies in every corner of the country... Waiting for how they turn it off and on of its an additive in the fuel... Waiting for photos of the injection hardware installed en mass in commercial aircraft
Show me THAT and I'll sticky this shit all over the place 24/7 for a week straight
Your beliefs of "what is true" are irrelevant. The evidence either supports something or it doesn't. The evidence is the evidence is the evidence. If people aren't allowed to present evidence, how can you possibly see it? How can anyone see it? How can we debate it?
You are making yourself The Arbiter of Truth. You aren't helping anyone by silencing evidence you think is bunk, you are harming an honest investigation into the Truth. If you think the evidence is bunk, present evidence to the contrary. Protesting "but why haven't we seen X, Y, and Z" is not an argument against evidence.
Let me give you an example you might appreciate.
"How can Pizzagate be real if there is no basement!?!"
How often do we see exactly this argument. If evidence of the basement is censored, the belief continues ad infinitum. This is exactly the same type of action of censorship you are promoting with your "disbelief" argument (and power to censor).
How? The same way I debate everything else, by presenting arguments and evidence. The point is not whether you, or I, or anyone believes in Chemtrails (or any topic), the point is whether or not someone who presents evidence of it should be censored. I suggest that is the worst possible action that can be taken. You support such censorship of evidence you don't like full Gestapo style, because you think it must be bullshit.
As an aside (because it's not my point), after all the evidence I've seen, I am fairly convinced that you haven't seen anything on Chemtrails (likely because you censor it before looking). The evidence is substantial. I may not be "beyond a reasonable doubt" on it, but it is definitely in the "maybe" range. I'd even go so far as to call it "likely true." However, that is my personal view on it based on the evidence I've seen; i.e. the stuff that wasn't censored before I was able to see it (or found elsewhere).
I assert neither you nor I know the Truth about it, or anything else, at least not the Whole Truth. If censorship of evidence we don't like is allowed, getting closer to that Whole Truth can't happen.
Let me ask you a hypothetical. What if it turns out that "Chemtrails" are real. This is just a hypothetical, I'm not going to post on the mountains of evidence to support it. If it is real, and an active play against We The People, isn't such censorship harming people? Don't we need to know? Maybe if it is real, we can find ways of reducing the damage it does to our lives. There is no way to know if the topic is silenced.
Now let's say its not real, how can we know if we aren't allowed to debate the evidence? HOW CAN WE KNOW???
If the debate is silenced, we can't really understand the full agenda of the Cabal. We can't really understand what it is we need to focus on, and fight against. Censorship of dissenting topics never aids in an investigation into the Truth.
If it's on Q, and if Q were to direct us to take it seriously and talk about it, it would be all over this WIN.
Still waiting for info on how the chemtrail team somehow covers the skies in every corner of the country... Waiting for how they turn it off and on of its an additive in the fuel... Waiting for photos of the injection hardware installed en mass in commercial aircraft
Show me THAT and I'll sticky this shit all over the place 24/7 for a week straight
Your beliefs of "what is true" are irrelevant. The evidence either supports something or it doesn't. The evidence is the evidence is the evidence. If people aren't allowed to present evidence, how can you possibly see it? How can anyone see it? How can we debate it?
You are making yourself The Arbiter of Truth. You aren't helping anyone by silencing evidence you think is bunk, you are harming an honest investigation into the Truth. If you think the evidence is bunk, present evidence to the contrary. Protesting "but why haven't we seen X, Y, and Z" is not an argument against evidence.
Let me give you an example you might appreciate.
How often do we see exactly this argument. If evidence of the basement is censored, the belief continues ad infinitum. This is exactly the same type of action of censorship you are promoting with your "disbelief" argument (and power to censor).
How can you debate it? It's simple, and has been outlined here many times before: on conspiracies.win. If it's not on Q, take it there.
How? The same way I debate everything else, by presenting arguments and evidence. The point is not whether you, or I, or anyone believes in Chemtrails (or any topic), the point is whether or not someone who presents evidence of it should be censored. I suggest that is the worst possible action that can be taken. You support such censorship of evidence you don't like full Gestapo style, because you think it must be bullshit.
As an aside (because it's not my point), after all the evidence I've seen, I am fairly convinced that you haven't seen anything on Chemtrails (likely because you censor it before looking). The evidence is substantial. I may not be "beyond a reasonable doubt" on it, but it is definitely in the "maybe" range. I'd even go so far as to call it "likely true." However, that is my personal view on it based on the evidence I've seen; i.e. the stuff that wasn't censored before I was able to see it (or found elsewhere).
I assert neither you nor I know the Truth about it, or anything else, at least not the Whole Truth. If censorship of evidence we don't like is allowed, getting closer to that Whole Truth can't happen.
You should be deported for your abuse of the green text. You come off condescending like a Now This video.
But that's not in the rules, so I'm not going to. If you aren't happy, start your own WIN.
You go right ahead and Hitler your way down to that deport button and do your worst.
Everyone you disagree with should be censored amirite?
My guy, these mods were so petty that they took away my pepe avatar. Why? Probably for questioning the religious hivemind here.
Get the mods butthurt and they act accordingly.