At this point, if real Q were to come back, it'd have to be on something like Truth social where we know that it's Q. If Watkins can change anything at will then there's no point in trusting anything on his board.
Q on Truth wouldn't be good for their goal, sadly.
But it's clear Watkins needs to be handled by that team.
Knew he was sketchy when the media was walking a Watkins around as if he was Q. Apple doesn't fall far from the tree..almost as if they were planning for this for a while, and are now trying to set it up for their narrative.
At this point, if real Q were to come back, it'd have to be on something like Truth social where we know that it's Q. If Watkins can change anything at will then there's no point in trusting anything on his board.
Q on Truth wouldn't be good for their goal, sadly.
But it's clear Watkins needs to be handled by that team.
Knew he was sketchy when the media was walking a Watkins around as if he was Q. Apple doesn't fall far from the tree..almost as if they were planning for this for a while, and are now trying to set it up for their narrative.
"Q would have to". ππππ
Suit yourself however Q and Trump will suit their plans rather than conforming to your commands and decrees
So "we know".
Who is this " we" you claim to speak for? Suffering from a Multiple Personality Disorder? Possessed by demons? π
Brilliant analysis. Thanks for using your precious time to make such a helpful and intelligent post
Thereβs no demands. Itβs simply a discussion.