If youve been reading Q since Oct 2017, you know what I mean
Edit to clarify--what I mean is there is a Q way of speaking and this lacks it.
Ok eg this stood out immediately: Use your logic
Tell me why this is not Q like
If youve been reading Q since Oct 2017, you know what I mean
Edit to clarify--what I mean is there is a Q way of speaking and this lacks it.
Ok eg this stood out immediately: Use your logic
Tell me why this is not Q like
I think all these "doesnt sound like Q" posts are funny
I havent seen many, I think only one other but why funny? There should be critical analysis of a sudden Q re-emergence
Just hilarious to think people are going to discount him by tone.....apparently there have been tone switches in the past...maybe different guys are posting
Maybe the tone is MEANT to be different as we move to another phase of operations....
Im saying critcal anaysis is good, lets find the truth.,,,I dont think that we will find any definitive proof in tone though.......
Yes.
There has been at least one sort of AI analytic run over all the Q posts looking at diction, verbiage used, sentence structure, timestamps on posts, whats cited and how it is cited and the other properties indicating a leak of tones, characteristics etc of specific people behind the postings. It concluded that there were multiple people posting under the Q moniker. Which given the importance of the operation ought always have been the assumption - an elite team under perhaps a rotating-shifts sort of work schedule rather than a single person that is also a single point of failure.
If thats still the case now, or new people have joined the ranks, I wouldn't be surprised. Nor would it indicate a compromise of the mission if so.
I think most reading Q since beginning understood Q to be a team. The team varied in tone, but some things were consistent. This possibly fits wiithin that, I totally can see that as possible. But it lacks that still, and could just be bc of a long hiatus.
Yeah I guess that is why I dont put much stock in the tone thing and wont spend time on that aspect of it.....
Suspect we will know with strong confidence either way before long though...
But that's one reason why there has to be solid re-verification, especially after such a gap
I remember that. If I recall correctly somebody was trying to figure out who Q really was and they did some analysis and said it pointed to 2 different people, but they didn't specify who. sauce
Im with you, I want truth! And FTR to everyone I cant say its not Q, I could be wrong, but wanted to note that the tone os different.
And thats what I meant by reading since beginning, youre right there have been tone changes. This one Im looking at critically thru a lens of a year and half later--not the time to change tone. And the 'use your logic' jumped out. I cant get past that one bc logic/logical is a word used many times--and its never 'your' logic. It is logic.
"A year and a half later".
1700 days from his first post. Eight months and 17 days since his last post. The same day Trump held a rally 17 miles outside of Quincy whose official nickname is Qtown.
ok fair enough....
I think you have a pattern of sounding funny :)
Right?? This is a blatant shill wave. Why this crap is stickied is beyond me.
Just look at all the doubting comments. I only recognize a few of the account names.
ALL ASSETS DEPLOYED.