Immediately upon setting their new password, anons were provided two Q/POTUS deltas with consecutive tweets by Trump.
Then in the next drops Q posted a photo of a watch at 1:29 and re-shared a ‘Justice’ marker from December 9 2017.
Then on December 9, 2019 at exactly 1:29 the IG report was published by the DOJ Twitter account, and at the same moment statements by AG Barr and John Durham were posted to their respective Twitter accounts. Also worth reminding that the IG report revealed 17 errors/commissions in the Carter Page FISA.
If I were Q, I'd probably plan something even more impressive than this for my return after an 18-month period of absence
This is a very good point. It would have been trivial for Q to assuage any doubts immediately before the first post. A couple DJT zero deltas with a "trip_id" post first would have made it difficult to deny.
Instead we got:
Shall we play a game once more?
But it's not "a game." We aren't "playing a game." Without surrounding context this sounds juvenile to me and very much not Q.
On the contrary, Q said numerous times:
THIS IS NOT A GAME.
Whenever Q said, "shall we play a game?" there was surrounding context for what "the game" was. It wasn't the whole thing, but some specific event that was "game like" because of the other actors involved.
I'm not saying it's impossible, or not true, or not Q. I am just not convinced, yet Q has always been quite convincing. That alone makes me sus.
I need more, we all need more, we are not getting more. This whole thing is sus.
Here is what throws me off a bit about this. There was a user that asked if it was really Q to go to his private board and delete a certain topic just to prove it. 2 minutes later it was done. I will see if i can find that post.
From what I've gathered, so long as you have access to the tripcode you can delete the private thread no problem.
It effectively proves nothing -- not even admin status required. If you have the tripcode access, you can do whatever.
The rotated salt theory is the best so far. I can take or leave Jim Watkin's involvement, despite his shady behavior.
The real question at hand is not so much why they would impersonate Q, if it is indeed an imposter, but WHY NOW of all times if they could have done this at any point in the past?
A Roe v. Wade overturn wasn't directly alluded to by any Q posts. Why make that the "comeback" marker as compared to TruthSocial going live, Ghislaine Maxwell's verdict, or even Biden's SOTU?
True, Roe v. Wade has been the first bonafide "win" Conservatives have had in a long, long time, but it's only got superficial significance when it comes to taking the country back from the tyrants in charge.
Immediately upon setting their new password, anons were provided two Q/POTUS deltas with consecutive tweets by Trump.
Then in the next drops Q posted a photo of a watch at 1:29 and re-shared a ‘Justice’ marker from December 9 2017.
Then on December 9, 2019 at exactly 1:29 the IG report was published by the DOJ Twitter account, and at the same moment statements by AG Barr and John Durham were posted to their respective Twitter accounts. Also worth reminding that the IG report revealed 17 errors/commissions in the Carter Page FISA.
Graphic for watch / IG report proof: https://media.128ducks.com/file_store/11e2ceaa317a41640f3b091e6538a0ceffb2e55d3de337ee73d493f7b5730926.png
Q referred to this as their "calling shot".
If I were Q, I'd probably plan something even more impressive than this for my return after an 18-month period of absence…
This is a very good point. It would have been trivial for Q to assuage any doubts immediately before the first post. A couple DJT zero deltas with a "trip_id" post first would have made it difficult to deny.
Instead we got:
But it's not "a game." We aren't "playing a game." Without surrounding context this sounds juvenile to me and very much not Q.
On the contrary, Q said numerous times:
Whenever Q said, "shall we play a game?" there was surrounding context for what "the game" was. It wasn't the whole thing, but some specific event that was "game like" because of the other actors involved.
I'm not saying it's impossible, or not true, or not Q. I am just not convinced, yet Q has always been quite convincing. That alone makes me sus.
I need more, we all need more, we are not getting more. This whole thing is sus.
Here is what throws me off a bit about this. There was a user that asked if it was really Q to go to his private board and delete a certain topic just to prove it. 2 minutes later it was done. I will see if i can find that post.
Doesn't that just mean admin privileges though? Couldn't anyone with admin or server access do that?
From what I've gathered, so long as you have access to the tripcode you can delete the private thread no problem.
It effectively proves nothing -- not even admin status required. If you have the tripcode access, you can do whatever.
The rotated salt theory is the best so far. I can take or leave Jim Watkin's involvement, despite his shady behavior.
The real question at hand is not so much why they would impersonate Q, if it is indeed an imposter, but WHY NOW of all times if they could have done this at any point in the past?
A Roe v. Wade overturn wasn't directly alluded to by any Q posts. Why make that the "comeback" marker as compared to TruthSocial going live, Ghislaine Maxwell's verdict, or even Biden's SOTU?
True, Roe v. Wade has been the first bonafide "win" Conservatives have had in a long, long time, but it's only got superficial significance when it comes to taking the country back from the tyrants in charge.