Remember the last time Q re-confirmed their identity after a salt refresh?
(media.greatawakening.win)
✅ - PROOF - ✅
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
Immediately upon setting their new password, anons were provided two Q/POTUS deltas with consecutive tweets by Trump.
Then in the next drops Q posted a photo of a watch at 1:29 and re-shared a ‘Justice’ marker from December 9 2017.
Then on December 9, 2019 at exactly 1:29 the IG report was published by the DOJ Twitter account, and at the same moment statements by AG Barr and John Durham were posted to their respective Twitter accounts. Also worth reminding that the IG report revealed 17 errors/commissions in the Carter Page FISA.
Graphic for watch / IG report proof: https://media.128ducks.com/file_store/11e2ceaa317a41640f3b091e6538a0ceffb2e55d3de337ee73d493f7b5730926.png
Q referred to this as their "calling shot".
If I were Q, I'd probably plan something even more impressive than this for my return after an 18-month period of absence…
This is a very good point. It would have been trivial for Q to assuage any doubts immediately before the first post. A couple DJT zero deltas with a "trip_id" post first would have made it difficult to deny.
Instead we got:
But it's not "a game." We aren't "playing a game." Without surrounding context this sounds juvenile to me and very much not Q.
On the contrary, Q said numerous times:
Whenever Q said, "shall we play a game?" there was surrounding context for what "the game" was. It wasn't the whole thing, but some specific event that was "game like" because of the other actors involved.
I'm not saying it's impossible, or not true, or not Q. I am just not convinced, yet Q has always been quite convincing. That alone makes me sus.
I need more, we all need more, we are not getting more. This whole thing is sus.
The most disturbing thing to me about the new drops is that 'Q' told anons to "Remember your oath".
No military leader would ever insult their subordinates in this way by calling into question their loyalty to the constitution.
When Q used this expression in the past it was directed at specific people within government who they knew to have been witness to or complicit in traitorous activity. This was Q's way of encouraging them to cooperate/testify in order to redeem themselves and their agency.
The way in which this expression was used in a recent 'Q' drop is incredibly ignorant and a terrible insult to the patriots who dedicate their time to The Great Awakening. But whoever wrote the drops is too dumb to even realize that and they think they're being clever re-hashing Q's previous expressions.
Yes, that totally rubbed me the wrong way when I first read it, and that was when I was thinking it was Q. Now I am doubly sus.
Devils advocate says how do you know who that statement was directed to?
Not trying to offend anyone, but this drop came around the time Breaking News Now or whatever posted something about the Pentagon not accepting Roe being overturned.
I took the oath reminder to be a warning that the domestic enemies were about to be testing their allegiance.
How does remember your oath call into question their loyalty to constitution.
See the previous Q drops that use this expression: https://qagg.news/?q=remember+your+oath
It's an expression Q uses to send a message when there is danger of someone potentially following an unconstitutional order, disobeying the chain of command, or to encourage testimony from someone who has information about "enemies foreign or domestic" that they need to formally report (not doing so would effectively be betraying their oath – failing to protect their country).
It's not something that needs to be 'reminded' to loyal (digital) soldiers who are serving admirably.
See also Q drops re: "You have a choice. Do what is right." which is another way Q conveys this same message.
When you're about to leave the house and you turn and tell your teenager, "remember you promised to (x)," are you not admonishing them because you think they're going to fail to live up to the commitment?
Remember your oath points to a video of admiral Mike Roger's taking the oath.
Mike Roger's being the guy who blew the whistle at the nsa on trumps spying.
Qppost 4430literally says remember your oath https://qposts.online/post/4430
Yes, this was to inspire others within government as Rogers is the perfect example of someone who risked their career to 'blow the whistle' and in doing so uphold his oath by protecting the incoming president from enemies domestic (Brennan, Clapper, Comey, etc).
Remember, digital soldiers only begun taking the oath in late June 2020. The reason this was encouraged by Q was to send a message to those within government who might have been nervous about providing testimony against members of the deep state.
Q told anons to "take the oath' on June 24, 2020, after they had already sent the "remember your oath" message x4. "RYO" has never been a message directed at anons.
It's about the new 2A law ... stay tuned ... not good
Here is what throws me off a bit about this. There was a user that asked if it was really Q to go to his private board and delete a certain topic just to prove it. 2 minutes later it was done. I will see if i can find that post.
Doesn't that just mean admin privileges though? Couldn't anyone with admin or server access do that?
From what I've gathered, so long as you have access to the tripcode you can delete the private thread no problem.
It effectively proves nothing -- not even admin status required. If you have the tripcode access, you can do whatever.
The rotated salt theory is the best so far. I can take or leave Jim Watkin's involvement, despite his shady behavior.
The real question at hand is not so much why they would impersonate Q, if it is indeed an imposter, but WHY NOW of all times if they could have done this at any point in the past?
A Roe v. Wade overturn wasn't directly alluded to by any Q posts. Why make that the "comeback" marker as compared to TruthSocial going live, Ghislaine Maxwell's verdict, or even Biden's SOTU?
True, Roe v. Wade has been the first bonafide "win" Conservatives have had in a long, long time, but it's only got superficial significance when it comes to taking the country back from the tyrants in charge.
Yes it means exactly that. That is exactly how the post got there in the first place - a board operator. Jim deleted it (if the theory of Jim and Babyfist colluding is correct).
that only proves Q's private board was comped by "B" or Q was posting as "B".
if Q wanted to feed us info that is not Q, he would just post as an anon. no B required.
exactly. an anon post on 8kun last night all the 4ch/8ch/8kun Q trips under attack and efforts to reestablish secure trip.
and we are going to be satisfied with this?? "Establishing comms." "Established."
further, the tripped drops don't sound like Q.
And, lest the coolest thing about Q3639 from 2 Dec 19 go unnoticed...it's literally one of the strongest Q proofs in existence:
When Trump tweeted 49 seconds later,
his tweet just happened to contain
all the characters in Q's new tripcode
including upper and lowercase letters, digits,
even both exclamation points.....
except one character...
the letter q
Autists calculated the odds against this happening by random chance, accounting for variables like average frequency of the two men's posting, number of characters allowed in tweets, number of unique characters possible in a trip, number of characters allowed in any trip, etc.
The final result was a yuge number, that I can tell you