Remember the last time Q re-confirmed their identity after a salt refresh?
(media.greatawakening.win)
✅ - PROOF - ✅
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
Here is what throws me off a bit about this. There was a user that asked if it was really Q to go to his private board and delete a certain topic just to prove it. 2 minutes later it was done. I will see if i can find that post.
Doesn't that just mean admin privileges though? Couldn't anyone with admin or server access do that?
From what I've gathered, so long as you have access to the tripcode you can delete the private thread no problem.
It effectively proves nothing -- not even admin status required. If you have the tripcode access, you can do whatever.
The rotated salt theory is the best so far. I can take or leave Jim Watkin's involvement, despite his shady behavior.
The real question at hand is not so much why they would impersonate Q, if it is indeed an imposter, but WHY NOW of all times if they could have done this at any point in the past?
A Roe v. Wade overturn wasn't directly alluded to by any Q posts. Why make that the "comeback" marker as compared to TruthSocial going live, Ghislaine Maxwell's verdict, or even Biden's SOTU?
True, Roe v. Wade has been the first bonafide "win" Conservatives have had in a long, long time, but it's only got superficial significance when it comes to taking the country back from the tyrants in charge.
It was on 6/24/2022, -->
2_2+2
2+4
6
Numerically speaking, it's not an insignificant day. More significant, because of how it is laid out, than merely adding up to 666 (each number becomes the next in sequence). It's also the peak of the decline of the year (last day of the solstice). I mean, I don't know if any of that has any deeper meaning, but it might to them. It also could be someone pretending like it has significance, because some people like us would see it as meaningful. It's likely something more though, and a good question.
Julian Assange is due back in the states any day now.
And, while I kind of doubt it’s going to happen this way, a military presence will be required if SCOTUS decides in the WV v EPA opinion tomorrow that the majority of government administration institutions are unconstitutional.
Shit will hit the fan if that happens.
Yes it means exactly that. That is exactly how the post got there in the first place - a board operator. Jim deleted it (if the theory of Jim and Babyfist colluding is correct).
that only proves Q's private board was comped by "B" or Q was posting as "B".
if Q wanted to feed us info that is not Q, he would just post as an anon. no B required.