As many of you have heard, “Roe” of Row v Wade infamy, made a deathbed confession, where she admitted that she was a paid actor, that she was told what to say, and that she lied about being raped.
And she did that, as part of a plan, a conspiracy, if you will, to legalize the industrial scale murder of 63,000,000 unborn babies.
As many of you know, the Boston Marathon Bombing was a DHS mass casualty drill/incident done under the Urban Shield program,
Nobody got hurt, nobody died.
It was a “drill gone live”, just like so many other false flags, including 9/11.
The US Supreme Court is going to decide, if the US government, and/or State government, has the authority to kill YOU, based on the Tsarnaev case.
While many “right leaning” people support the death penalty, i would like to point out that anyone who believes in “limited government” ought to belive in limiting the governments ability to kill you.
When the Governor of Illinois learned that HALF of the people on death row, were later exonerated, he put a moratorium on executions, until they could figure out why so many innocent people were on death row.
At the time, he was harshly criticized, partiularly by “the right”.
It seems the right can be just as much of a blood thirsty mob as the left can be.
And thats why we need to limit the governments ability to kill people,
Per the 8th amendment…
If the right-leaning SCOTUS rules in favor of allowing the government to kill its own people…
Whats to stop them from killing you?
We used to talk about the “sealed indictments”,
When there was only 5,000
Or 15,000
Or 50,000
And now theres some astronomical numer of sealed indictments, and nobody talks about it anymore.
What if one of those indictments is for you?
What if your government decided you has committed some crime, just by sharing info about Q ?
BOTH Iraq Wars were started, with a BIG LIE
The Vietnam War was started, with a BIG LIE.
WW2 was started, with a BIG LIE
And nobody ever gets in trouble,
Nobody goes to prison.
“To save the villiage, we had to destroy the villiage”
Oh, ok.
Well if you say so, then i guess Ill just have to trust you, again.
What are some other fake news stories that are being pushed to shape a narrative and an agenda?
Thank you for correcting OP. I do believe this was a False Flag and I know people got hurt as I used to work with Heather Abbott.
The immediate lockdown the authorities implemented here in New England was a real eye-opener. The media was drooling as information was slowly dripping out and nobody seemed to mind that metro Boston was under martial law.
The media's infatuation with the Tsarnaev that survived was strange and their refusal to connect the other crimes the dead brother committed made me suspicious. Their Muslim faith seemed to become an "excuse" for their strange lifestyle.
You misunderstood me, I don’t believe it was a false flag at all. What was the motive? What we’re the actions taken after the bombing that needed to be proceeded by a bombing?
Nothing that I can think of.
Similar to what u/ZerroDefex said, I believe the older Tsarnaev was mentally unstable (mentally manipulated), was allowed to fly under the radar even through Russia warned us so his actions could be influenced by the C|A.
The motive was to see how far they could push a big city like Boston to succumb to martial law. It was a complete lockdown for Back Bay, Brookline, Watertown, Cambridge, Roxbury and others I can't remember. Everyone was forbidden from traveling and the police / feds had free reign to script the events however they wished.
Seems pretty convenient, if the goal is to see how far they could go, why hasn’t a similar event occurred since? What’s the point of testing out the theory that Marshall law would work if there is no end game? A large coordinated movement has to have intention, it can’t just be “because power”
False Flag doesn't mean it was all fake with actors, that's the bullshit Mockingbird version made to discredit it in the eyes of normies. "Sailing under a false flag" means pretending to be someone else so that they get blamed, innocents do indeed die in false flags the false flag part is the perpetrator turning out to be an FBI asset or such.
Okay, so it continues; what was the point? Why pretend to be someone else? What was the action that occurred because of this false flag? I refuses to acknowledge the validity that a massive action with civilian casualties was under taken without any sort of intention. 9/11, totally make sense you had the patriot act and the Iraq war, but the school shootings, Las Vegas, Boston bombing? They don’t achieve anything despite massive public outcry so what was the goal?