Apparently twatter is still infested with censorship-crazed marxist turds. Mr. Peterson apparently spoke out about a sad little woman-deluded-into-thinking-she's-a-man/tranny having her breasts removed. Calling out body mutilation by the mentally ill is apparently still verboten over at that bastion of satanic narrative propagation, twatter. Does Mr. Musk have control of this firm's serious problems with respecting the 1A or not? Perhaps the remaining DS have just lost all care for the upcoming accountability they're going to have to face.
https://nypost.com/2022/06/30/twitter-suspends-jordan-peterson-for-elliot-page-sin-tweet/
You may also want to consider some other opinions on JP.
https://greatawakening.win/p/142B5koN5q/another-shill-exposed-jordan-pet/
I agree with what your post said and it reflects my position in my above comment.
I really don't know much about JP at all, why I went searching in GAW to see others' takes on him. Thank you for your weighing-in on him as you're obviously more knowledgeable about JP than I am. The above link discussing JP was worth reading to see both sides.
My main contentions in this post are that twatter is still censoring along the marxist narrative and Musk, who the last I'd heard was still in the process of purchasing the twatter firm, seems to have absolutely nothing to say about this. In fact, it seems he's been twitter-silent for awhile now (so I hear).
Opinions on JP seem to be a mixed bag, just like Musk. I'm about fully on the fence with Musk as it's hard to reconcile what seems like, perhaps 70% positive-speak and action versus 70% negative-speak and background, numbers just pulled out of thin air as a general sense of the mountains of pro vs con arguments regarding him.
We've heard lots from Musk in the past about 1A with regards to twitter. As the person in the process of purchasing the firm, his weighing-in on the JP suspension would seem appropriate and would likely help spread awareness. We all know he doesn't (yet) "control" twatter, but he does have influence when he speaks out against censorship. It would seem like a real good time for Musk to call out current twatter leadership for allowing censorship of a person - whether or not one likes him - who decries doctors involved in body mutilation surgeries. Just mho.
I have to wonder though, what's the difference between him telling people to get the jab and Trump telling people to get the jab?
I'm not the person to ask about JP's stance on "vaccines" (aka experimental drug injections); perhaps ask anon SelfReliancePepe. In general though, if a person advocates for people to take the jab, if you want, that it should not be mandated, and that there's no reason for kids to get it, it's a lot different than those who suggest taking it because otherwise you're a science-denying, socially-irresponsible, grandma-killing, should not be allowed to buy groceries and are responsible for everyone's misery at being locked-down person.
I agree. There is a huge difference between the two. Dr. Peterson took it but has stated that he took the jab because he thought they would leave him alone. They did not. He does not believe in mandates and hasn't said anything about kids needing the jab. He does not advocate for the jab or Vax mandates. I'd say JP falls under the first group you mentioned, same as Trump.