Look fren, the descending 360' turn made with the aircraft that allegedly hit the Pentagon, coming in at ground level is pretty much impossible even for pilots on heavy's with 1000's of hours, let alone someone who couldn't get clearance for solo in a Cessna! The input on the controls would have been so minimal you wouldn't be able to tell, just think it and you'd probably over control it!
"So they made that portion up for what purpose?"
Because whoever wrote it, they weren't airline pilots, and needed the radar plot to match the story, because the airframes were being flown remotely!
I could go on to the black boxes, the edited frames of the Pentagon car park barrier video we have, the cell phones apparently working on the aircraft at 32,000' the ground speeds and more.
Because wowever wrote it they weren't airline pilots, and needed the radar plot to match the story, because the airframes were being flown remotely!
Thank you fren.
I could go on to the black boxes, the edited frames of the Pentagon car park barrier video we have, the cell phones apparently working on the aircraft at 32,000' the ground speeds and more.
No need, I already know it was a FF. Just asking why they made up that one portion of the speeds. I wonder how many legit pilots read that and said wtf?
I can't for remember off the top of my head the airspeeds quoted, but I recall them being way outside Velocity Max Operating and off the chart for any safety factor, something in the region of 140 Kts IAS over VMO. The airframe would have ripped itself apart, with wing flutter, resonance and other nasty's!
Look fren, the descending 360' turn made with the aircraft that allegedly hit the Pentagon, coming in at ground level is pretty much impossible even for pilots on heavy's with 1000's of hours, let alone someone who couldn't get clearance for solo in a Cessna! The input on the controls would have been so minimal you wouldn't be able to tell, just think it and you'd probably over control it!
"So they made that portion up for what purpose?"
Because whoever wrote it, they weren't airline pilots, and needed the radar plot to match the story, because the airframes were being flown remotely!
I could go on to the black boxes, the edited frames of the Pentagon car park barrier video we have, the cell phones apparently working on the aircraft at 32,000' the ground speeds and more.
Thank you fren.
No need, I already know it was a FF. Just asking why they made up that one portion of the speeds. I wonder how many legit pilots read that and said wtf?
Do you remember what the speeds were?
Lol I must fix that typo! "Wowever"
I can't for remember off the top of my head the airspeeds quoted, but I recall them being way outside Velocity Max Operating and off the chart for any safety factor, something in the region of 140 Kts IAS over VMO. The airframe would have ripped itself apart, with wing flutter, resonance and other nasty's!
I didn't even notice that misspelling, my mind read it as "however".
interdasting, you must be a planefag?
Yes anon, ex rotary mil pilot.
I noticed the misspelling "nasty's" (= belonging to nasty) instead of "nasties".