This like the 4th or 5th group who is responsible for J6. The FBI, The Jews, Antifa, now Ukrainians, always seems to change based who the chosen enemy is that day, Interesting.
Its undeniable that antifa were there, John Sullivan was present with his pet CNN reporter in tow. Its also becoming undeniable that ukrainians were there also. This isnt something that is changing on any given day, the facts stand on their own and are immutable unless debunked or explained away somehow - which has not yet happened. Why wouldn't multiple leftist agitator groups be bought in to attack an event? Nothing says that any one crime group gets exclusive access.
Who is antifa, who was leading them into the fray? Where were they communicating to discuss such things? I have yet to see a single person point me in the direction of how this notorious group is seemingly capable of all of these highly coordinated events without a central leader.
You mean to tell me you have never seen or heard of antifa groups on twitter? Try following Andy Ngo: https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo
So to answer, they can organize and communicate anywhere they like. Seemingly criminal behavior on twitter, on facebook, on the google platforms are neither punished nor policed when its antifa communications.
That might suggest something to the astute observer.
If there are that many examples please, feel free to share them. I just read through 100 tweets and not a SINGLE quote tweet about the these antifa communications.
"Interesting". Confessional Projection? Do you change narratives in order to maintain comfy feels rather than seeking truth?
Part of the J6 op =/= Responsible.for the J6 op.
Believing only ONE group was used in the J6 Op will create confusion as new data points emerge. Believing only ONE group was used in the J6 Op hinders ones ability to accurately assess what happened.
As Q suggested many times, "expand your thinking". Avoid emotions. Use logic.
This like the 4th or 5th group who is responsible for J6. The FBI, The Jews, Antifa, now Ukrainians, always seems to change based who the chosen enemy is that day, Interesting.
Its undeniable that antifa were there, John Sullivan was present with his pet CNN reporter in tow. Its also becoming undeniable that ukrainians were there also. This isnt something that is changing on any given day, the facts stand on their own and are immutable unless debunked or explained away somehow - which has not yet happened. Why wouldn't multiple leftist agitator groups be bought in to attack an event? Nothing says that any one crime group gets exclusive access.
Who is antifa, who was leading them into the fray? Where were they communicating to discuss such things? I have yet to see a single person point me in the direction of how this notorious group is seemingly capable of all of these highly coordinated events without a central leader.
You mean to tell me you have never seen or heard of antifa groups on twitter? Try following Andy Ngo: https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo
So to answer, they can organize and communicate anywhere they like. Seemingly criminal behavior on twitter, on facebook, on the google platforms are neither punished nor policed when its antifa communications.
That might suggest something to the astute observer.
If there are that many examples please, feel free to share them. I just read through 100 tweets and not a SINGLE quote tweet about the these antifa communications.
"Interesting". Confessional Projection? Do you change narratives in order to maintain comfy feels rather than seeking truth?
Part of the J6 op =/= Responsible.for the J6 op.
Believing only ONE group was used in the J6 Op will create confusion as new data points emerge. Believing only ONE group was used in the J6 Op hinders ones ability to accurately assess what happened.
As Q suggested many times, "expand your thinking". Avoid emotions. Use logic.