Sorry but you are wrong again. Humans are actually made up of 46 different sets of DNA, these are your chromosomes. It would be one thing to say that the DNA was being spliced into, or integrating into, one of your 46 chromosomes. However that’s not what this paper is saying. Presumably it is just being transcribed into its own DNA sequence.
There are many DNA viruses that do the same thing. They actually carry DNA and inject it directly into the nucleus of the cell. In this case, instead of injecting DNA into the cell, the vaccine injects mRNA which is converted to DNA.
So again, the ultimate question that needs to be answered is what is the ultimate fate of this DNA. Is it passed on to daughter cells? If so then that might be more of a problem.
Let me ask you then, since you know so much about these things. What happens to the DNA that is injected into your cells by DNA viruses? Such as adenovirus, which causes the common cold. Is that now a part of your DNA too??
adenovirus specifically uses a non-integrating vector, so in that particular scenario no it does not.
The whole point of sharing this study is that what was previously said to be 'impossible' or 'conspiracy' is actually happening: The viral sequence is entering the nucleus and integrating with your DNA. Despite any mainstream claims that the mRNA shots use a non-integrating vector, actual lab results show integration.
Ok - I don't understand much of this at all, but your language "the viral sequence is entering the nucleus and integrating with your DNA." Is this 'replacing' existing DNA? If that's the case, I could see the possibility of replication into a current or future fetus - but if it is just 'extra parts' which is 'integrating' with your DNA, does that logically get replicated and passed on? or would just the 'original' DNA get replicated and passed on to offspring?
“Unlike RNA viruses, the genome of DNA viruses is already a potential substrate for host genome integration, without the need for prior processing. In general, the genome of DNA viruses is translocated to the nucleus, where it remains as an episome to ensure viral persistence. However, the genome of some DNA viruses can be found inserted in the host genome. The mechanisms underlying these integration events, incidental or non-incidental, are still poorly characterized, and the potential advantages for these DNA viruses to integrate are still obscure. Understanding these mechanisms should help elucidate the role of DNA virus integration in the viral life cycle. This section will summarize the current knowledge on integration of some prototypic DNA viruses as well as highlighting some mechanisms involved in this process.”
As you can see, entry of DNA into the nucleus does not necessarily equate to host cell integration of a transgene. In order for gene integration in a controlled fashion, multiple additional steps of DNA processing are required. Random DNA integration is of course always possible.
From my understanding, nowhere in the artical posted by OP does it say that the DNA is integrating into the host genes.
That doesn’t mean it’s not happening. These vaccines are seriously alarming and I would not be surprised if they were integrating into the host genes. All I’m saying is that this article does not directly address integration as far as I can tell.
Sorry but you are wrong again. Humans are actually made up of 46 different sets of DNA, these are your chromosomes. It would be one thing to say that the DNA was being spliced into, or integrating into, one of your 46 chromosomes. However that’s not what this paper is saying. Presumably it is just being transcribed into its own DNA sequence.
There are many DNA viruses that do the same thing. They actually carry DNA and inject it directly into the nucleus of the cell. In this case, instead of injecting DNA into the cell, the vaccine injects mRNA which is converted to DNA.
So again, the ultimate question that needs to be answered is what is the ultimate fate of this DNA. Is it passed on to daughter cells? If so then that might be more of a problem.
Lol where else do you think DNA is being transcribed into? Into the DNA of the cell nucleus.
Once again another statement that makes no sense. It’s being transcribed into YOUR dna. Not “it’s own”.
You can’t just keep telling other people that they are “wrong” without understanding any of this.
Let me ask you then, since you know so much about these things. What happens to the DNA that is injected into your cells by DNA viruses? Such as adenovirus, which causes the common cold. Is that now a part of your DNA too??
adenovirus specifically uses a non-integrating vector, so in that particular scenario no it does not.
The whole point of sharing this study is that what was previously said to be 'impossible' or 'conspiracy' is actually happening: The viral sequence is entering the nucleus and integrating with your DNA. Despite any mainstream claims that the mRNA shots use a non-integrating vector, actual lab results show integration.
And how does a non-integrating vector differ from an integrating vector?
Ok - I don't understand much of this at all, but your language "the viral sequence is entering the nucleus and integrating with your DNA." Is this 'replacing' existing DNA? If that's the case, I could see the possibility of replication into a current or future fetus - but if it is just 'extra parts' which is 'integrating' with your DNA, does that logically get replicated and passed on? or would just the 'original' DNA get replicated and passed on to offspring?
To further help you out, here’s a good summary paper.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7120651/#Sec7title
“Unlike RNA viruses, the genome of DNA viruses is already a potential substrate for host genome integration, without the need for prior processing. In general, the genome of DNA viruses is translocated to the nucleus, where it remains as an episome to ensure viral persistence. However, the genome of some DNA viruses can be found inserted in the host genome. The mechanisms underlying these integration events, incidental or non-incidental, are still poorly characterized, and the potential advantages for these DNA viruses to integrate are still obscure. Understanding these mechanisms should help elucidate the role of DNA virus integration in the viral life cycle. This section will summarize the current knowledge on integration of some prototypic DNA viruses as well as highlighting some mechanisms involved in this process.”
As you can see, entry of DNA into the nucleus does not necessarily equate to host cell integration of a transgene. In order for gene integration in a controlled fashion, multiple additional steps of DNA processing are required. Random DNA integration is of course always possible.
From my understanding, nowhere in the artical posted by OP does it say that the DNA is integrating into the host genes.
That doesn’t mean it’s not happening. These vaccines are seriously alarming and I would not be surprised if they were integrating into the host genes. All I’m saying is that this article does not directly address integration as far as I can tell.