You read way the hell too far into my post such that the meaning of my words went completely over your head.
I got that you were talking about that it was no longer necessary. I think you may have missed my meaning. I was talking about not just how we got here from a larger scope than you were talking about, but what we can do about it above and beyond just "not having representatives because they aren't necessary anymore".
I'm not sure why you felt the need to be insulting, but it doesn't help advance the conversation at all. Just because I expanded from your thoughts, doesn't mean I was attacking you. There was no reason to attack back, because I wasn't attacking you, or your thoughts, in any way. I even stated explicitly that I agreed with you, but was expanding the scope.
Perhaps "you read way the hell too far into my post such that the meaning of my words went completely over your head."
My response went over your head, so I pointed that out. I don't find it insulting whatsoever what I said, I don't get what you are trying to even say you are just rambling at this point. I didn't even disagree with your original post just added to it that the way the world is now we don't have any need to have somebody "represent" us, we can do it ourselves. I even said that some sort of government is likely to form no matter what! I was literally agreeing with you and adding to what you said and for some reason that went totally over your head man. No reason to get upset over it, reply if you want I don't have anything else to add because fundamentally we dont seem to disagree, just my original point went so far over your head I can't seem to place where it went.
My response went over your head, so I pointed that out
There is literally nothing in "my response went so far over your head.." etc. that is not insulting. Even if it were true, which I assure you, it was not, it would still be intentionally inflammatory rhetoric.
Since it didn't "go over my head" but I understood exactly what you were saying, what you pointed out was incorrect. Your response was fundamentally flawed in the premise, and thus the conclusion.
I didn't even disagree with your original post just added to it that the way the world is now we don't have any need to have somebody "represent" us, we can do it ourselves.
I KNOW that. I stated it in my original response, AND my follow up response. You are obviously not even reading what I'm writing.
You keep believing you understand everything though, I'm ok with that. I'm sure you are too.
I got that you were talking about that it was no longer necessary. I think you may have missed my meaning. I was talking about not just how we got here from a larger scope than you were talking about, but what we can do about it above and beyond just "not having representatives because they aren't necessary anymore".
I'm not sure why you felt the need to be insulting, but it doesn't help advance the conversation at all. Just because I expanded from your thoughts, doesn't mean I was attacking you. There was no reason to attack back, because I wasn't attacking you, or your thoughts, in any way. I even stated explicitly that I agreed with you, but was expanding the scope.
Perhaps "you read way the hell too far into my post such that the meaning of my words went completely over your head."
Just a thought. Not sure where I got it from.
You guys engaged in violent agreement created a thread that would make for its own kick ass post.
We have the BEST ANONS!!
My response went over your head, so I pointed that out. I don't find it insulting whatsoever what I said, I don't get what you are trying to even say you are just rambling at this point. I didn't even disagree with your original post just added to it that the way the world is now we don't have any need to have somebody "represent" us, we can do it ourselves. I even said that some sort of government is likely to form no matter what! I was literally agreeing with you and adding to what you said and for some reason that went totally over your head man. No reason to get upset over it, reply if you want I don't have anything else to add because fundamentally we dont seem to disagree, just my original point went so far over your head I can't seem to place where it went.
There is literally nothing in "my response went so far over your head.." etc. that is not insulting. Even if it were true, which I assure you, it was not, it would still be intentionally inflammatory rhetoric.
Since it didn't "go over my head" but I understood exactly what you were saying, what you pointed out was incorrect. Your response was fundamentally flawed in the premise, and thus the conclusion.
I KNOW that. I stated it in my original response, AND my follow up response. You are obviously not even reading what I'm writing.
You keep believing you understand everything though, I'm ok with that. I'm sure you are too.
I see something flying over your head, may want to look up 🤣. Calm down and have a breather my man, you are flipping out over literally nothing
It's been a while since I've been legitimately trolled. Thank you, I'd almost forgotten what it was like.