I was recently discharged from service over refusing a direct order to get the shot. This issue over compensation for injury was the exact point I raised over a year ago when they first started pushing the jab on us (before it was mandatory). I remember the head medical officer for our TMC gave us a presentation on the jab and why it's perfectly safe to get, yada yada yada.
At the end of the presentation he did a Q&A and so I asked the question of "if we are to suffer serious adverse side effects from this, who will pay given that the pharmaceutical companies aren't held liable by the government?" He couldn't give me an answer other than "uh well I'm not sure but the VA should be able to help answer that." Of course I wasn't going to get the vaccine anyway, I was just asking a reasonable sounding question for the normies in the room who were clueless to help them think about the consequences.
Demand the approved formulation: Comirnaty. They cannot provide it because Pfizer will never make it. It's a loophole, but you can technically say you are willing to follow orders and they cannot provide the approved formulation because it does not exist. Anything else is not FDA-approved and cannot be mandated.
You SHOULD be able to sue. Not that our court system is useful.
Once the fraud is apparent from Pfizer, which is already proven in the documents they tried to hide for 75 years, all of that liability protection goes out the window.
I know of a really reputable guy saying Pfizer is going to go bankrupt from the lawsuits. Maybe a nice short on that stock is going to do well...
People pushing these things have acted like the other side is sitting down at the negotiation table with them. If so, why would I sign a one sided deal? Only an idiot would sign a deal in which the "profit" and "benefit" all went to the other side. If you ask me to do something that offers me nothing, not even protection from it's causes, then you are asking me to do a huge favor. If we are setting down at a negotiating table, it is not to do a favor for the other side.
How many job interviews have you sat down at in which they tell you all the things you will not be getting, and you will be there as a volunteer and will not get paid, and no incentive. How long would you remain sitting at that interview table?
Agent orange 2.0
The military will be paying for this one for a long time.
I was recently discharged from service over refusing a direct order to get the shot. This issue over compensation for injury was the exact point I raised over a year ago when they first started pushing the jab on us (before it was mandatory). I remember the head medical officer for our TMC gave us a presentation on the jab and why it's perfectly safe to get, yada yada yada.
At the end of the presentation he did a Q&A and so I asked the question of "if we are to suffer serious adverse side effects from this, who will pay given that the pharmaceutical companies aren't held liable by the government?" He couldn't give me an answer other than "uh well I'm not sure but the VA should be able to help answer that." Of course I wasn't going to get the vaccine anyway, I was just asking a reasonable sounding question for the normies in the room who were clueless to help them think about the consequences.
Demand the approved formulation: Comirnaty. They cannot provide it because Pfizer will never make it. It's a loophole, but you can technically say you are willing to follow orders and they cannot provide the approved formulation because it does not exist. Anything else is not FDA-approved and cannot be mandated.
You SHOULD be able to sue. Not that our court system is useful.
Once the fraud is apparent from Pfizer, which is already proven in the documents they tried to hide for 75 years, all of that liability protection goes out the window.
I know of a really reputable guy saying Pfizer is going to go bankrupt from the lawsuits. Maybe a nice short on that stock is going to do well...
People pushing these things have acted like the other side is sitting down at the negotiation table with them. If so, why would I sign a one sided deal? Only an idiot would sign a deal in which the "profit" and "benefit" all went to the other side. If you ask me to do something that offers me nothing, not even protection from it's causes, then you are asking me to do a huge favor. If we are setting down at a negotiating table, it is not to do a favor for the other side. How many job interviews have you sat down at in which they tell you all the things you will not be getting, and you will be there as a volunteer and will not get paid, and no incentive. How long would you remain sitting at that interview table?