The live streams come from NASA. I don't trust the rest of the Fed gov, so why would I think NASA is the exception? Because science? Like the science from the CDC or FDA or EPA? Government science is political garbage.
You can grab a high powered telescope and observe these things yourself, by pointing it at the moon or any of the planets close enough to see.
You can launch a weather balloon high into the atmosphere with a GoPro and a tracker and perceive the curvature of the planet, and see it doesn't sprawl endlessly.
They aren't implanting what you see into your head in real time. We have consumer technologies that can prove it wrong. You're just too much of a cheapskate to buy them, and too stupid to use them, and too stubborn to accept what they show you.
The live streams come from NASA. I don't trust the rest of the Fed gov, so why would I think NASA is the exception? Because science? Like the science from the CDC or FDA or EPA? Government science is political garbage.
You can grab a high powered telescope and observe these things yourself, by pointing it at the moon or any of the planets close enough to see.
You can launch a weather balloon high into the atmosphere with a GoPro and a tracker and perceive the curvature of the planet, and see it doesn't sprawl endlessly.
They aren't implanting what you see into your head in real time. We have consumer technologies that can prove it wrong. You're just too much of a cheapskate to buy them, and too stupid to use them, and too stubborn to accept what they show you.
GoPro produces curved photos. https://community.gopro.com/s/article/How-to-Reduce-the-Fisheye-Effect-in-Photos-and-Videos?language=en_US
Point that telescope at the horizon and see that the ships that disappear over the horizon didn't actually disappear.
I'm not 100% sold on flat earth, but the science on the spinning ball theory has a lot of holes to fill.
I'd like to see some photos from space that do not originate from NASA. Spacex maybe?
Specious at best.