The atmosphere has gas pressure without a container, thanks to gravity (like any other planet). What relationship does that have to flat vs. globular Earth? (Other than that it works with a globular Earth but makes no sense for a flat Earth.)
Eratosthenes was correct about a globular Earth. Which was proven for a fact by circumnavigation. You really can't get your head around that, can you? Circumnavigation is the most "hand's-on" evidence you can get, and you wish to brush that off. It is conclusive.
That and the fact that the cartography of the Earth cannot be reconciled by a flat projection, but only by a spherical projection. Also, by being on the other side of the Earth we can see the other half of the constellations. Not possible on a flat Earth.
No one gives a shit about "FE theory", because "FE theory" doesn't actually want to take science into account and no one who follows "FE theory" goes out to prove it.
Just sit on their ass drinking beer and trying to slide unrelated discussions.
It is a circle...around a globe. They headed in a constant direction (east or west) and returned to their starting point. You can't do that on a pizza. There are no edges. It is all seamless surface that closes. Kind of hard to deny when you get into space and can see it as a whole...but you guys like to deny the evidence. Meanwhile, it doesn't stop us from establishing satellite weather monitoring or photo-reconnaissance systems.
I will repeat. The circumnavigation can be plotted on a map, and the only kind of map that makes sense of the Earth's surface is that on a globe. You can't make a flat map work. The distant edges of portions will not stitch together.
When you are on the other side of the Earth, you see the other half of the constellations. That is only possible if you are on the OTHER SIDE. There is no "flat earth theory." There is only flat earth arm-waving and ignorance about geophysics. And history.
The atmosphere has gas pressure without a container, thanks to gravity (like any other planet). What relationship does that have to flat vs. globular Earth? (Other than that it works with a globular Earth but makes no sense for a flat Earth.)
Eratosthenes was correct about a globular Earth. Which was proven for a fact by circumnavigation. You really can't get your head around that, can you? Circumnavigation is the most "hand's-on" evidence you can get, and you wish to brush that off. It is conclusive.
That and the fact that the cartography of the Earth cannot be reconciled by a flat projection, but only by a spherical projection. Also, by being on the other side of the Earth we can see the other half of the constellations. Not possible on a flat Earth.
Under FE theory circumnavigation is just circlenavigation.
No one gives a shit about "FE theory", because "FE theory" doesn't actually want to take science into account and no one who follows "FE theory" goes out to prove it.
Just sit on their ass drinking beer and trying to slide unrelated discussions.
It is a circle...around a globe. They headed in a constant direction (east or west) and returned to their starting point. You can't do that on a pizza. There are no edges. It is all seamless surface that closes. Kind of hard to deny when you get into space and can see it as a whole...but you guys like to deny the evidence. Meanwhile, it doesn't stop us from establishing satellite weather monitoring or photo-reconnaissance systems.
I will repeat. The circumnavigation can be plotted on a map, and the only kind of map that makes sense of the Earth's surface is that on a globe. You can't make a flat map work. The distant edges of portions will not stitch together.
When you are on the other side of the Earth, you see the other half of the constellations. That is only possible if you are on the OTHER SIDE. There is no "flat earth theory." There is only flat earth arm-waving and ignorance about geophysics. And history.