Why is Medscape announcing that hematologists (blood doctors) are ready to jump in and treat acute radiation sickness from a nuclear attack. This article is being emailed out to doctors all across America, yet almost no one is talking about it in mainstream media.
(www.medscape.com)
đź‘€ EYES ON! đź‘€
This is just the next predictable phase of their attack agenda.
They want to slaughter most of us to make the survivors easier to control; and they're telegraphing the shit out of their moves, just like they did with the first plandemic.
The big difference between the side of Evil and our side is in the 'execution.'
We are doing nowhere NEAR enough of that. (Yet?) That's the big difference.
They DO shit.
We CATCH them doing shit. (And each time, we get shocked, offended, and frustrated by the new depths of their depravity—depths to which we never could have imagined that any human could ever even conceive of reaching, let alone actually do it. Then they do their next atrocity, such as, say, oh I dunno, the brazen mass slaughter of thousands of innocent children by deliberate poisoning. And again we reel in disbelief and horror as it continues, day after day, right on schedule. Rinse and repeat.)
That's the basic status of the war at this juncture: Horrific offense from democrats, promoted and protected by media >>> Shock and stunned disbelief from patriots >>> New, more horrific offense offense from democrats, promoted and protected by media >>> More shock and paralyzed disbelief from patriots >>> etc.
If this is part of the overall Plan, one would have to say it's working! :) Qeq
My wife were talking about how tattoos used to be limited to a vary small segment of society; maybe some marines and navy guys, carnival workers, convicts, etc.. Then, what, 20 years ago or so, they started going mainstream to where people who would never have thought of getting a tattoo 30 years ago are getting them, and now, instead of just one of two in discreet locations, people get them all over their arms and legs, and then, that wasn't enough, their faces. It's like depravity has to increase in order for the depraved to be satisfied.
If you read about depravity—on the level of deliberately slaughtering thousands of children with poison—and immediately think "That's similar depravity as TATTOOS"...then you have some deep-seated issues about individual free choice to have body art.
Tons of military and veterans...tons of diehard Trump and Q supporters...have body art. We haven't killed any kids. Heck, we haven't even raped any dogs or horses. We're not any more depraved than someone who thinks we're depraved just because we have art on our body. We're nice people who just like body art. When it goes on, it hurts no one but ourselves. Why be so uptight about it. Judging us as "depraved" for our taste in what constitutes beauty or art is just wrongheaded.
Your username says PhD. Presumably you possess intelligence and critical thinking skills. Use them. Try applying more discernment and less judgmentalism about the personal expression styles and artistic taste of others.
We're in a war here. You never know when the patriot hand that is extended to help you might have... ::shudder:: an ARTISTIC DESIGN on it.
Damn cov, that was a Editorily done sir. And spot on. Was thinking about my next tattoo when I read this lol.
Upvoted.
Hint hint
A pretty good discussion of the issue:
https://biblereasons.com/tattoos/
I included a link to an image of someone pretty much covered with tattoos, which I believe is pretty depraved. No, I don't equate tattoos with aborted children, or many evil actions, but why not put the art on a wall? For the most part, people with tattoos can't even see their own tattoos, so what is the reason for it? Has anyone ever said, in their last dying moment, "My only regret was never getting a tattoo!"? My main point is that tattoos used to be a very fringe societal activity, and is now mainstream. Couples living together used to be a very fringe societal thing, and is now mainstream. Pre-marital sex used to be a quite limited thing, and is now almost the norm. Homosexuality used to be a VERY fringe societal activity, and is now openly celebrated. Do you see the pattern?
Hey, tattooed skin makes better lampshades for the deepstate.
Women with an arm sleeve tattoos are showing up lmao.
I've seen many sleeved females,
Not that I have any or plan to get any, but what do people around here have against tattoos? I feel like people should be able to do whatever they want so long as it doesn't hurt anyone else. Someone getting a tattoo doesn't hurt anyone else, and it's debatable to what extent it even hurts the individual getting it in the first place.
I get that it can be a matter of personal preference, some people like the looks of them, others don't. But I feel calling them "depraved" is going a bit far, isn't it?
Seems that might depend upon whether they are satanic theme tatts, which many seem to be.
And the "if it doesn't hurt anyone else, what is wrong with it?" is used to justify homosexuality and all sorts of sinful behavior. God is the judge of what is right and wrong, and in addition to some Bible verses mentioning that tattoos are not to be done, it doesn't take much thinking to realize, God made humans, He probably wouldn't be too happy with humans marking up the bodies He gave them.
God say to judge not lest ye be judged. Guessing he likes to keep that boss task to himself.
It's the extreme tattooing that is depraved. https://newfitnessnews.co.uk/it-was-pretty-painful-andy-ruiz-jr-recounts-getting-bizarre-viral-tattoo/
Sort of like one or two drinks is not a big deal, but slobbering alcoholism is definitely a problem. Tattooing is essentially defacing the skin God gave you.
God says he doesn't look upon the flesh but upon the heart.
You worry for God over something God doesn't see.
When do we attack them?