SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome) is called by all the vaccines given to babies.
(media.communities.win)
🔍 Notable
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (127)
sorted by:
I would tend to agree. On the fence about them causing anywhere near the same amount of sudden deaths as the Covid therapeutic shot causes, but wouldn't surprise me if they are known at some level to cause some amount of issue.
But people are forgetting what was going on before the vaccines, and we live in a world - especially a country that has been shielded by the effects of not vaccinating your kids for a few generations now. The world of non vaccinated kids was horrific - and guaranteed if we stopped doing it even people on these boards who are super anti-vaccine would be begging doctors to vaccinate their kids to stop some of these illnesses that would start showing up.
Bullshit. Diseases in our world took a steep nosedive when sanitation standards improved. Plain and simple. Running water and washing hands has done more for public health than any "vaccine".
Improvements in sanitation are obviously important, but that alone is not the cause of the decrease of diseases.
If it was, then all diseases would have decreased at the same time. But if you look at the rates of these diseases over time, you will notice that cases did not permanently decrease until after a vaccine for the particular disease was implemented.
For instance, polio cases dropped drastically after the vaccine was introduced in the 1950s. But chickenpox didn't decrease significantly until the chicken pox vaccine was introduced in the 1990s.
If you look at each disease we currently vaccinate for, you'll see that this trend continues.
And there's a reason why I used the phrase "permanently decrease" above. Epidemics frequently look like roller-coasters when graphed. Cases spike during the worst part of the epidemic, then fall when the epidemic is over. If someone wanted to make it look like diseases were going away before a vaccine was introduced, they would cherry pick a date that ended at the end of an epidemic. It's after vaccines are introduced that epidemics end for a disease.
And if there are increased cases of the disease, they are almost always because of reduced vaccination rates. And don't confuse death rates with case rates. We're always developing new antibiotics and medications that save people from dying of diseases.
I mention these last few things because they're frequently brought up in these arguments. Someone will invariably post some cherry picked dates at the end of an epidemic, or post something about cases spiking recently or changing the topic from case rates to death rates (chickenpox) and such. Hopefully people who respond to this post will read it through before jumping in to post and make my point for me.
Let me guess, airplanes fly over your house spraying chemicals and the earth is flat?
Never. Not me. It took me 22 years of researching to be sure I made the right decision to stop vaccinating my children when they were preschool age....and my confidence in that decision is stronger than ever. We have been lied to about how effective vaccines were. The insurance companies and schools and doctors have all been lied to. Even the creators of them said they should only be used in an outbreak not prophylactically. There are too many risks.
There's a saying that vaccines are the victim of their own success. We rarely see any of those diseases that vaccines prevent, so they're not real to us.