https://www.howbadismybatch.com/cdcexpiry3.pdf
Why do other batches have no expiry date? Why do the batches with expiry date happen to be the deadly ones? Why does CDC want to keep this list a secret?
The reason is that the batches which contain the mRNA vaccines are the ones that would expire. The batches with the saline are the ones that don't need an expiry date.
Does it mean all the batches other than the deadly ones were actually Saline?
Most of the humanity is actually safe?
Im pretty sure there was more than just Saline in EVERY jab. I don't know a single jabbite (i just made that up) that did not have some kind of reaction post poke. Severities were up and down the scale. Some were laid up for a week, some were down for just a few hours.
That said … I think it is entirely plausible that the ‘expiry batches’ were ‘juiced’.
Yeah, I am inclined to believe this too. Probably the toxins were not biologically active - and hence no need for expiry?
The shit they used as the delivery encapsulate is enuf to make anyone sick:
SM-102, Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 2000 dimyristoyl glycerol (DMG)., 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC)
Fuking SM102 is an industrial solvent. I have a close friend that is the top OSHA guy for a F500 corp. he said that shit is heavily regulated when used in any industrial process … yet for the jab - crickets. The FDA website says 70-80% of the population has some degree of allergy to PEG.
Its fuking insane that people even now don't bother to do a simple search of the PRIMARY shit in every shot. Retards.
SM-102 is not a "solvent." (I mean, everything is a solvent to something, but that's not what "solvent" usually means).
SM-102 is just a amino lipid. Looking at the molecule it looks like it is easily broken down by normal lipid breakdown pathways (beta-oxidation e.g.). It is a relatively simple molecule, with no apparent hot spots. That doesn't mean it can't possibly be toxic, but I see no toxicity signals in the molecule itself (as in none).
It is the solvent that the SM-102 is stored in that is toxic (chloroform), and the reason for the regulation. Extracting the solute (SM-102) from the chloroform is a relatively simple process. It is highly unlikely that substantial amounts of chloroform (if any at all) are in the vaccines after the SM-102 molecules are extracted and then put in an aqueous solution to make the lipid nanoparticle.
SM-102, as far as I can tell, and as far as all the evidence I have seen, is not a danger in any way.
PEG on the other hand can have toxicity issues, but its commonly a function of the length of the molecule (in this case ~2000 monomers of ethylene glycol). Of course the total amount is probably a bigger issue.
It can be broken down by the body however, so it isn't a permanent toxicity, and it isn't a ubiquitous one. I find your statement of 70-80% toxicity highly suspect. It has been used for many years without issue in other applications, though not usually in this amount.
There is likely a genetic predisposition to an allergic reaction, and it would be a simple test to find out before injection (if there were any honest interest in a persons health in the Jabbing process).
It isn't the "primary" shit that's the problem. I have seen no evidence that supports such an assertion. Of course PEG does have issues, but like I said, a simple allergy test would take care of that completely.
Pfizer Fights to Control Secret of $36 Billion Covid Vaccine Recipe
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2021-pfizer-secret-to-whats-in-the-covid-vaccine/ (Bloomberg, November 14, 2021)
“The secret formula that Bourla [Pfizer’s CEO] is protecting is much more complicated than a simple recipe. Pfizer’s shot has more than 280 materials made by suppliers in 19 countries, many of which are protected in one form or another. For a manufacturer to produce a vaccine, it would have to negotiate multiple licenses to waive protections on everything from lipids to mRNA strands and trade secrets used in the manufacturing process. The waiver proposal could in theory do that in one go.”
Did your healthcare provider who jabbed you with Pfizer’s CV-19 shot inform you of what all the 280 ingredients were in addition to deleterious, immune-suppressive effects of the genome altering spike protein programming mRNA sequence before you gave your consent to be administered the shot?
Did they discuss the potential toxicity of any one of those 280+ materials with you, including what the body-altering mechanism of the experimental gene therapy is?
Did they tell you this injection was life altering, or was in any way possibly life threatening to you?
They didn’t?
Or did your boss say you’d better get jabbed, or you’d be fired?
Or did you get fired for refusing to be medically raped by the jab?
Or did any establishment, school, or government entity require you or your child to produce a “vackz passport” to enter their premises, or to engage in commerce with them?
If so … you might want to be contacting a smart tort lawyer, real soon.
Start here: Siri/Glimstad (NYC): https://www.sirillp.com/aaron-siri/