The key is that they don't seem to point where this was said. Discernment is required. Someone saying someone else said something with nothing to substantiate it is not discernment or intelligence, just because you want something to be true also does not make it so.
So it has no source and a lot of bad language in the piece, not very professional, no? So could be read as someone hated her to the core and wrote a revenge piece.
I mean I hate the Rothschilds and Greta to the core, they're all vile people.
But you just can't make claims like this and not even have a quote to point to. Indeed, very unprofessional and also indeed not true. Poisoning the well.
The key is that they don't seem to point where this was said. Discernment is required. Someone saying someone else said something with nothing to substantiate it is not discernment or intelligence, just because you want something to be true also does not make it so.
So it has no source and a lot of bad language in the piece, not very professional, no? So could be read as someone hated her to the core and wrote a revenge piece.
I mean I hate the Rothschilds and Greta to the core, they're all vile people.
But you just can't make claims like this and not even have a quote to point to. Indeed, very unprofessional and also indeed not true. Poisoning the well.