Mark Twain one based S.O.B.💥💥💥
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (39)
sorted by:
If you’re questioning whether or not God takes sides, read Mark Twains book about Joan of Arc. He considered it his best work
Interesting thank you for sharing I enjoyed reading Huck Finn and Tom Sawyer but that's all I ever read as a youngster. Twain's style of expression was always impressive to me had a way of boiling it right now to its bare bones.
Another One
'I have never let my schooling interfere with my education ' Mark Twain
I love Mark Twain Quotes this one is especially apt.
' It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled'
Last one
'Concerning the difference between Man and the Jackass: Some observers note that there isn't any, but this wrongs the jackass' Mark Twain
Famously hated Teddy Roosevelt who was an occultist and cabal member too.
He hated Teddy because he considered him authoritarian not because of the reasons you're making up.
https://mdmasons.org/about-md-masons/famous-masons/theodore-roosevelt/
yeah ok
Ok so
This doesn't show that Twain hated Roosevelt because he was a Freemason. Him being in an organization many community leaders in America were a member of just is a big shrug and not surprising.
Most of the founding fathers were in an evil cabal then? Sorry why are you (presumably because you're on this site) saying you'd fight to uphold their constitution if you think the people who wrote it were evil? hahahah
"Presidents known to be Masons include Washington, James Monroe, Andrew Jackson, James Polk, James Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, James Garfield, William McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, Warren Harding, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Lyndon Johnson, and Gerald Ford. Today there are an estimated two million Masons in the United States."
Source: https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/washington-becomes-master-mason
Yeah what a secret and evil society that has 2 million members
I know very little about the masons, but I recall one of their most infamous members was named Pike in the 1800's. Perhaps it was benign at the time of the founding fathers and later taken over by the cabal as one of their first big conquests.
That's a mighty big if just to keep your boogeymen. Don't strain yourself with them mental gymnastics. I hope you at least stretched before trying that one.
"A man named Pike in the 1800s". I'm sorry what? So one individual, who you can't even remember their name or what they did, turns a whole organization to evil and makes it stay that way until the 1900s?
This mess of a collection of letters misspelled Pike's name in the first paragraph. This is an unedited, unverified blog. This..
This wasn't even worth sharing.
Never said that.
Putting words in my mouth but they were freemasons, I mean I don't know what to tell you.
Well I'm not American but Franklin and Jefferson being masons doesn't make the constitution itself bad.
Why don't you go back to r/news if you think freemasonry is so benign?
You literally did. In your first comment and I quote "Famously hated Teddy Roosevelt who was an occultist and cabal member too." and then " It's well known that Teddy was a mason".
So are the Freemasons the cabal or not? If not which cabal was Roosevelt a member of? Because its pretty much settled that Twain didn't like Roosevelt because he was an imperialist.
If freemasons are an evil cabal and the founding fathers were part of an evil cabal, wouldn't that make the constitution a work of evil?
Na you guys are more fun.
Read it again, I didn't say that was WHY he hated Teddy.
The cabal is just secret societies of wealthy and powerful people who have initiations that involve child sacrifice. The Bilderberg group, the freemasons, the Illuminati, skull and bones society etc.
Again no, if Ted Bundy writes a shopping list does that make it an evil shopping list? The constitution is a work of secularism though and part of their plan to create a godless world but I don't think you're smart enough to understand that yet.
Its a bit of a stretch to say it was a part fo their official platform. They were founded through a strange bedfellows collaboration that included the Anti-Masons but that didn't really carry over outside of a general anti-elitist aspect of their platform.
this doesn't answer anything.
Even if a party did form to oppose them, doesn't mean they were an evil cabal hahaha. The opposition party could be the evil one. Or they could just be two opposing boring organizations.
It's written about extensively in 'Bloodlines Of The Illuminati' by Springmeier. It's well known that Teddy was a mason, I've posted a link in reply to another anon.
It's not who votes who matters but rather who counts the votes.
Still, there are people even here who believe that the solution is just to vote harder.
Doesn't help that Trump openly pushes for voting harder
voting harder exposes more fraud if the right people are watching
You mean the supreme court who dismissed all the cases for "lack of standing"? Or Congress of which majority voted to certify the results...
Sure, as long as people realize that voting won't actually solve anything and use it for the purely symbolic gesture that it is. Problem is, so many people point to voting as our solution.
Debatable. Hence the entirety of OP's post.
Because people fool themselves that they've done their part by filling a ballot once every 2 to 4 years and go back to sleep instead of doing something meaningful.
That’s interesting. Perhaps he’s right. Most likely is. I always feel like the “next” election will tell us if our votes count or not. But 2020 changed ever for me. I want to say if midterms go like they should go, maybe votes are counting. But then you got ‘24 around the corner...and maybe those will be the ones that count. Either way I’m starting to get to my conclusion. That I’m a damn fool, and I keep placing to much hope in man.
This is false on a level that needs to be addressed. Voting DID once make a difference; the problem is now our votes aren't counted because it is rigged. If it weren't rigged, we would have power in our votes.
When did voting matter?
When it isn't rigged, it matters. That's how our constitution and voting system are set up. It's balanced so the opinion of the masses has weight, while the opinion of our elected officials also has its own weight. I'm of the mind that it has ALMOST always been rigged, but that doesn't change the fact that the core of the Constitution describes a system that truly does give the people voting power.
Mark has a point, and I agree with it. But we must not COMPLETELY DISCOUNT voting. That is how we get political extremism in the courts and government. I know people who do not vote because they are demoralized. But that's similar to giving up before even throwing a punch in a fight against someone who will likely beat you to a pulp. Why not just fight?
The point some of us make is that there are more effective ways to fight than knowingly participating in a system rigged against us. Doing the same thing over and over which hasn't made things any better is madness.
Mark Twain was a pedo, with his little 'Angel-Fish' young gurls!
Mark Twain, a man of wit, humor, a gifted raconteur, and an irascible moralist...but he was not the author of the quote although it certainly sounds like him. It likely comes from the following:
Source: Robert S. Borden, Sept. 1976, in "Voice of the People," published in the Lowell Sun, a newspaper based in Lowell, MA
Voting is Dishonest and Fraudulent "Has it ever dawned on the editors that the attitudes of the 70 million projected non-voters may be very consistent with the reality that the concept of voting and electing representatives is basically dishonest and fraudulent. If voting could change anything it would be made illegal! There is no way any politicians can legally represent anyone because he was elected on a secret ballot by a small percentage of voters. He then claims to represent the people who voted against him and even those who wisely chose not to participate in such criminal activity.“