7 words. Stanley Kubrick on military base, June 1968.
Q post indicates we have landed on moon, just not publicly via Apollo. It was literally a movie. Stanley Kubrick made 2 movies. First released 1968, second one 1969.
Kubrick murdered in 1999 after revealing too much in “Eyes Wide Shut” with rumored plans to reveal his role in moon landing deception.
oops...mentioned illuminati "secrets"...getting mass downvoted now.
Why would there be "cratering" under the lander? The thrust was not great (low lunar gravity) and the surface powder was thin. Solid rock underneath. It was like clearing sand off a kitchen counter with a hair dryer. See, you don't think about these things.
The feed from the Moon was live.
The "evidence" is, to use a phrase, "fake and gay." There is no "evidence." There is only ignorance (e.g., above about cratering).
New technology coming down the road (SpaceX). You don't believe we have "lost" the technology for the Saturn V and Apollo capsule? We are building capsules again, if that will make you happy. The F-1 engines are gone forever. There were efforts to reinstate their manufacture and use them again, but there were hundreds of components for which the vendors had gone out of business. The effort to re-qualify new parts and vendors would have been tantamount to doing the development program all over again. Read your history.
I've never seen what you allege. Suspension systems cannot duplicate the behavior of rock dust in a vacuum under low gravity, which is possible only on the Moon.
They ran / walked very fast, so their motion seemed normal speed, when actually they were moving fast and tape slowed down to make it appear like no/ low gravity for other objects, like the dropping hammer etc. That they did.
Look at this 1 min video, you can see 2 things, one is the light reflecting off of the wire holding him at one point. Second, and most importantly, the wire 'jerks' him up when he was on the ground.
Of course they were faked. Moon landings were fake and ghey.
The fact no cratering under the 'lunar Lander' despite there needing to be thrust under it to land.
The coke can, yes Coke can, seen by viewers in Australia, as that feed going to Australia didn't have delay.
The official videos you can clearing to the light flashes above the AstroNots, which was the cable suspension system to fake the 'moon jumps'
The video was slowed down to give most of the no gravity effects etc.
Anyone who honestly thinks the moon landing was real has not looked into it at all. The evidence is overwhelming and undeniable.
Now whether or not people have actually gone to the moon is up for debate, but certainly all the 'official' stuff is all faked.
But considering we've never been back, and how they apparently 'lost' all the original technology makes it seem unlikely.
7 words. Stanley Kubrick on military base, June 1968.
Q post indicates we have landed on moon, just not publicly via Apollo. It was literally a movie. Stanley Kubrick made 2 movies. First released 1968, second one 1969.
Kubrick murdered in 1999 after revealing too much in “Eyes Wide Shut” with rumored plans to reveal his role in moon landing deception.
oops...mentioned illuminati "secrets"...getting mass downvoted now.
can't find the coca-cola bottle video from Australia. Have a link by chance?
Here's one of the ladies that witnessed it.
https://youtu.be/A1nTE3xgy30
Why would there be "cratering" under the lander? The thrust was not great (low lunar gravity) and the surface powder was thin. Solid rock underneath. It was like clearing sand off a kitchen counter with a hair dryer. See, you don't think about these things.
The feed from the Moon was live.
The "evidence" is, to use a phrase, "fake and gay." There is no "evidence." There is only ignorance (e.g., above about cratering).
New technology coming down the road (SpaceX). You don't believe we have "lost" the technology for the Saturn V and Apollo capsule? We are building capsules again, if that will make you happy. The F-1 engines are gone forever. There were efforts to reinstate their manufacture and use them again, but there were hundreds of components for which the vendors had gone out of business. The effort to re-qualify new parts and vendors would have been tantamount to doing the development program all over again. Read your history.
And the AstroNots jumping around on wires like some bloody puppets on a string, yeah that's real. Keeping living in a fairytale, didn't happen.
Now as I said, not saying we never went, but the footage of the 'offical' landings are fake and gay.
I've never seen what you allege. Suspension systems cannot duplicate the behavior of rock dust in a vacuum under low gravity, which is possible only on the Moon.
They ran / walked very fast, so their motion seemed normal speed, when actually they were moving fast and tape slowed down to make it appear like no/ low gravity for other objects, like the dropping hammer etc. That they did.
Look at this 1 min video, you can see 2 things, one is the light reflecting off of the wire holding him at one point. Second, and most importantly, the wire 'jerks' him up when he was on the ground.
https://youtu.be/X1cVnC7EtWw