Something went to the moon. Something came back. Observatories around the world were watching and tracking visually whenever they came within line of sight. The Russians and their allies were watching intently and spying. If the moon landing and return trip were faked, do people believe that the Soviets would not have published the fact that it was a fraud? Civilians can be duped, but the Soviets were not idiots. They damn sure had no reason to go along with the lie. The evidence is definitely questionable on both sides, but logically I have a hard time grasping that it was all faked, unless it was a worldwide conspiracy. It was a huge symbolic win against Russia and the Iron Curtain nations. I would think that if it was fake, there would have been allegations from Russia and their allies with proof. The folks who are adamant about this topic, one way or the other are displaying fan boi status. Keep an open mind. It may have been faked or it may be real, either way, it does zero to help us today. What the hell are people arguing about?
Playing devil’s advocate, what we’ve all learned over these last several years is that the DS/Cabal is in just about every country in the world, including the Russia/Old Soviet Union. This global plandemic is certainly a “world wide conspiracy” and yet billions of people believe it.
I didn't witness the launch, and return personally, so I make no firm commitment. I would like to believe we did achieve this epic milestone, but I really don't have a dog in the fight, so I just don't get the vehemence folks argue about this.
Agreed. I don’t know one way or the other either. But if it’s possible to have faked it, given everything I’ve learned over the last several years about the DS/Cabal and the deception they’ve perpetrated against humanity, it wouldn’t surprise me.
There have been some revelations about worldwide conspiracies that has created doubt about most of the things I thought I knew. Most of these things are about inconsequential data that isn't critical to my life or important in the grand scheme of things, but the awareness has made me look at events differently today. When we see large investment corps buying up private homes, Bill Gates buying farmland and investing heavily in Vaccines, forced EUA medical garbage, it all looks very suspicious to me and knowing that worldwide conspiracies exist, it isn't only possible, it is probable. The questioning of everything that I thought I knew has made me aware that the world is very strange and that we are under attack and have been for a long time. This is what brought most of is here, this is what red pills are all about.
It was real, and there is no benefit in denying the truth. This idea of "keeping an open mind" is just an unwillingness to sort truth from lies---which is a desire to keep lies in play, perpetually.
Open minds require actual evidence, not conspiracy theories or fabulous imaginary scenarios.
Perhaps, perhaps not. If anything has been revealed to me is that I shouldn't take a hardline stance on anything I haven't done proven my very self. I question everything now, unless I can personally confirm or deny it. I will listen and view all evidence, but I still won't go all in and assault anyone else's beliefs. I may think some folks are silly, but I won't disparage them. Spirited disagreement is fun, but keep it light.
At some point, you will have to trust your life to what you know...and it is impossible to verify all knowledge personally. People ask me if I gamble, and my answer is "only with my life."
The best armor of truth is a broad knowledge that connects subject matter together. If the span of knowledge integrates, that is a good sign that it does so because it is true. Nature is far more complicated than any conspiracy could ever hope to be.
You have to continue to operate and function with certain beliefs. Those beliefs may be very convincing and be strongly linked to evidence that asserts their validity, however rejecting any new evidence that is contradictory to your beliefs is the problem with science and many other people today. If new evidence is presented, I approach it with some skepticism, and analyze the evidence carefully to determine validity. If I find it true, I don't necessarily abandon my original belief, I just take it into consideration and weigh the new evidence against the body of other evidence and determine that my belief may be wrong, but definitely need to investigate further into all the evidence to find out if there are flaws in some of the evidence. My basic point is that I try to keep an open mind and not lash out against people without careful consideration.
Something went to the moon. Something came back. Observatories around the world were watching and tracking visually whenever they came within line of sight. The Russians and their allies were watching intently and spying. If the moon landing and return trip were faked, do people believe that the Soviets would not have published the fact that it was a fraud? Civilians can be duped, but the Soviets were not idiots. They damn sure had no reason to go along with the lie. The evidence is definitely questionable on both sides, but logically I have a hard time grasping that it was all faked, unless it was a worldwide conspiracy. It was a huge symbolic win against Russia and the Iron Curtain nations. I would think that if it was fake, there would have been allegations from Russia and their allies with proof. The folks who are adamant about this topic, one way or the other are displaying fan boi status. Keep an open mind. It may have been faked or it may be real, either way, it does zero to help us today. What the hell are people arguing about?
Playing devil’s advocate, what we’ve all learned over these last several years is that the DS/Cabal is in just about every country in the world, including the Russia/Old Soviet Union. This global plandemic is certainly a “world wide conspiracy” and yet billions of people believe it.
I didn't witness the launch, and return personally, so I make no firm commitment. I would like to believe we did achieve this epic milestone, but I really don't have a dog in the fight, so I just don't get the vehemence folks argue about this.
Agreed. I don’t know one way or the other either. But if it’s possible to have faked it, given everything I’ve learned over the last several years about the DS/Cabal and the deception they’ve perpetrated against humanity, it wouldn’t surprise me.
There have been some revelations about worldwide conspiracies that has created doubt about most of the things I thought I knew. Most of these things are about inconsequential data that isn't critical to my life or important in the grand scheme of things, but the awareness has made me look at events differently today. When we see large investment corps buying up private homes, Bill Gates buying farmland and investing heavily in Vaccines, forced EUA medical garbage, it all looks very suspicious to me and knowing that worldwide conspiracies exist, it isn't only possible, it is probable. The questioning of everything that I thought I knew has made me aware that the world is very strange and that we are under attack and have been for a long time. This is what brought most of is here, this is what red pills are all about.
It was real, and there is no benefit in denying the truth. This idea of "keeping an open mind" is just an unwillingness to sort truth from lies---which is a desire to keep lies in play, perpetually.
Open minds require actual evidence, not conspiracy theories or fabulous imaginary scenarios.
Perhaps, perhaps not. If anything has been revealed to me is that I shouldn't take a hardline stance on anything I haven't done proven my very self. I question everything now, unless I can personally confirm or deny it. I will listen and view all evidence, but I still won't go all in and assault anyone else's beliefs. I may think some folks are silly, but I won't disparage them. Spirited disagreement is fun, but keep it light.
At some point, you will have to trust your life to what you know...and it is impossible to verify all knowledge personally. People ask me if I gamble, and my answer is "only with my life."
The best armor of truth is a broad knowledge that connects subject matter together. If the span of knowledge integrates, that is a good sign that it does so because it is true. Nature is far more complicated than any conspiracy could ever hope to be.
You have to continue to operate and function with certain beliefs. Those beliefs may be very convincing and be strongly linked to evidence that asserts their validity, however rejecting any new evidence that is contradictory to your beliefs is the problem with science and many other people today. If new evidence is presented, I approach it with some skepticism, and analyze the evidence carefully to determine validity. If I find it true, I don't necessarily abandon my original belief, I just take it into consideration and weigh the new evidence against the body of other evidence and determine that my belief may be wrong, but definitely need to investigate further into all the evidence to find out if there are flaws in some of the evidence. My basic point is that I try to keep an open mind and not lash out against people without careful consideration.