“ There is no evidence "that a human being wouldn't be able to survive radiation exposure in the Van Allen radiation belt." There is only evidence that they did.”
That’s if you believe we actually went to the moon.
Of course there is “belief” necessary. You “believe” those rocks that are in a museum somewhere actually came from the moon and not from somewhere here on earth. It wouldn’t be the first time someone passed of a counterfeit as the real thing. Like I said in my original comment; in my book the jury is still out on the subject.
You don't have any process for the jury to make a conclusion. All the evidence you need is already present. I believe that somebody went to the Moon because I saw it happen in full view before the world. A Saturn V is not "fake and gay" (as some would maintain). One does not create an entire industry for the sake of a motion picture.
There is the principle of a working hypothesis. On the basis of what you know, take a posture. It's okay to listen to anyone who has something worthwhile to say. But you have to know more than those who parade their misunderstanding and ignorance for evidence of mystery and deception.
”I believe that somebody went to the moon because I saw it happen in full view before the world.”
No, you saw a Saturn rocket launch into the atmosphere and continue to ascend until it was no longer visible. You have no proof that there were men aboard that rocket nor that it actually went to the moon. The only “proof” you have is that “officials” told the world that Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and Michael Collins were aboard the rocket and the rocket actually went to the moon. And as we’ve discovered over these last several years “officials” never lie. <sarc>
“One does not create an entire industry for the sake of a motion picture.”
I don’t think the vast majority of moon landing deniers believe an entire industry was created to make a motion picture. If I’m in the moon landing denial camp, I would argue that the “industry” as you describe it was an offshoot of the military (remember the first rockets, Redstone and Atlas, were in fact military ballistic missiles). So the industry was already in existence for other reasons and they just poured more money into it for project Apollo. That additional money could very easily have been funneled off for DS/Cabal black projects around the world. What if project Apollo was begun with every intention of going to the moon but it was later discovered that it was technically impossible to do at the time but the nation was already so committed to the project and “beating” the Soviet Union, that it would have been unthinkable to admit to the world that we couldn’t do it? Therefore, continue with the project, get congress to appropriate hundreds of millions of dollars to the project, many civilian products could be “discovered” and hundreds of millions could be funneled off foe black projects? It’s not unthinkable. It happens even today.
“ There is no evidence "that a human being wouldn't be able to survive radiation exposure in the Van Allen radiation belt." There is only evidence that they did.”
That’s if you believe we actually went to the moon.
Since they brought back chunks of it, it sort of follows that they were there. No "belief" necessary.
Of course there is “belief” necessary. You “believe” those rocks that are in a museum somewhere actually came from the moon and not from somewhere here on earth. It wouldn’t be the first time someone passed of a counterfeit as the real thing. Like I said in my original comment; in my book the jury is still out on the subject.
You don't have any process for the jury to make a conclusion. All the evidence you need is already present. I believe that somebody went to the Moon because I saw it happen in full view before the world. A Saturn V is not "fake and gay" (as some would maintain). One does not create an entire industry for the sake of a motion picture.
There is the principle of a working hypothesis. On the basis of what you know, take a posture. It's okay to listen to anyone who has something worthwhile to say. But you have to know more than those who parade their misunderstanding and ignorance for evidence of mystery and deception.
”I believe that somebody went to the moon because I saw it happen in full view before the world.”
No, you saw a Saturn rocket launch into the atmosphere and continue to ascend until it was no longer visible. You have no proof that there were men aboard that rocket nor that it actually went to the moon. The only “proof” you have is that “officials” told the world that Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and Michael Collins were aboard the rocket and the rocket actually went to the moon. And as we’ve discovered over these last several years “officials” never lie. <sarc>
“One does not create an entire industry for the sake of a motion picture.”
I don’t think the vast majority of moon landing deniers believe an entire industry was created to make a motion picture. If I’m in the moon landing denial camp, I would argue that the “industry” as you describe it was an offshoot of the military (remember the first rockets, Redstone and Atlas, were in fact military ballistic missiles). So the industry was already in existence for other reasons and they just poured more money into it for project Apollo. That additional money could very easily have been funneled off for DS/Cabal black projects around the world. What if project Apollo was begun with every intention of going to the moon but it was later discovered that it was technically impossible to do at the time but the nation was already so committed to the project and “beating” the Soviet Union, that it would have been unthinkable to admit to the world that we couldn’t do it? Therefore, continue with the project, get congress to appropriate hundreds of millions of dollars to the project, many civilian products could be “discovered” and hundreds of millions could be funneled off foe black projects? It’s not unthinkable. It happens even today.