The most convincing argument I’ve heard about the moon landing being faked is that a human being wouldn’t be able to survive radiation exposure in the Van Allan radiation belt. In my book, the jury is still out on this topic. Besides, if they faked the moon landing, imagine the millions (billions in todays dollars) that could have been funneled into CIA and DS black projects around the world.
Nearly everything presented by corporate fascist “mass” media, “history” books and “academics” since WWII was and is a lie including the “moon landing” which was debunked by the BBC, the fact pattern that details the shenanigan including the “accidental” deletion of the original footage, actual science, coded speech from Neil Armstrong and the officially released 2nd hand footage itself.
No problem getting through the Van Allen belt. You just zip through at thousands of miles per hour. There is no loitering, and the belts are relatively close to the Earth. They do not extend to the Moon.
The "radiation" consists of high-energy electrons and protons. No gamma rays, alpha particles, or neutrons. Much of it may be mitigated by shielding.
There is no evidence "that a human being wouldn't be able to survive radiation exposure in the Van Allen radiation belt." There is only evidence that they did.
We did it before, and I don't think you can pull up any NASA statement that it is death to transit the belts. It's not healthy, of course, and anything we can do to mitigate the exposure is better for the astronauts. Kind of like automobile safety. People work on it all the time, but not because we would die from driving an automobile.
I think you don't know anything about the subject, frankly, and are just cherry-picking your favorite (unnamed) Authority.
“ There is no evidence "that a human being wouldn't be able to survive radiation exposure in the Van Allen radiation belt." There is only evidence that they did.”
That’s if you believe we actually went to the moon.
Of course there is “belief” necessary. You “believe” those rocks that are in a museum somewhere actually came from the moon and not from somewhere here on earth. It wouldn’t be the first time someone passed of a counterfeit as the real thing. Like I said in my original comment; in my book the jury is still out on the subject.
The most convincing argument I’ve heard about the moon landing being faked is that a human being wouldn’t be able to survive radiation exposure in the Van Allan radiation belt. In my book, the jury is still out on this topic. Besides, if they faked the moon landing, imagine the millions (billions in todays dollars) that could have been funneled into CIA and DS black projects around the world.
Nearly everything presented by corporate fascist “mass” media, “history” books and “academics” since WWII was and is a lie including the “moon landing” which was debunked by the BBC, the fact pattern that details the shenanigan including the “accidental” deletion of the original footage, actual science, coded speech from Neil Armstrong and the officially released 2nd hand footage itself.
I agree except they lied to us about everything ‘before’ WWII as well as after.
No problem getting through the Van Allen belt. You just zip through at thousands of miles per hour. There is no loitering, and the belts are relatively close to the Earth. They do not extend to the Moon.
The "radiation" consists of high-energy electrons and protons. No gamma rays, alpha particles, or neutrons. Much of it may be mitigated by shielding.
There is no evidence "that a human being wouldn't be able to survive radiation exposure in the Van Allen radiation belt." There is only evidence that they did.
Really, then why does nasa have guys working on how to safely transit it without dying. Their words. We can't do it yet.
We did it before, and I don't think you can pull up any NASA statement that it is death to transit the belts. It's not healthy, of course, and anything we can do to mitigate the exposure is better for the astronauts. Kind of like automobile safety. People work on it all the time, but not because we would die from driving an automobile.
I think you don't know anything about the subject, frankly, and are just cherry-picking your favorite (unnamed) Authority.
“ There is no evidence "that a human being wouldn't be able to survive radiation exposure in the Van Allen radiation belt." There is only evidence that they did.”
That’s if you believe we actually went to the moon.
Since they brought back chunks of it, it sort of follows that they were there. No "belief" necessary.
Of course there is “belief” necessary. You “believe” those rocks that are in a museum somewhere actually came from the moon and not from somewhere here on earth. It wouldn’t be the first time someone passed of a counterfeit as the real thing. Like I said in my original comment; in my book the jury is still out on the subject.