Going back to post 619 the expectation is set that trying top level NWO/DS operatives in civilian courts would be pointless. The alternative not stated explicitly would be Military Tribunals.
https://qposts.online/?q=619&s=postnum
Post 2523 and 2583 are more explicit and talks about the charge of being an unlawful enemy combatant. It discusses an exchange between Lindsey Graham and then Judge Kavanaugh on the topic. And tribunals.
https://qposts.online/?q=2523&s=postnum
https://qposts.online/?q=2583&s=postnum
Then we end up with 3716 and 3717 identical posts. Who is charged under sealed indictment and who is first arrested may not be as important as what the charges are and who is taking them into custody. The door has to be opened on Law of War violations for Military Tribunals to be used. Maybe what we should be looking for is the first charge of being an unlawful enemy combatant.
And what came of that again? BOTH times? A big fat nuthin’.
🤔 Did you read my comment? “Nothing will stick.” Trump was impeached 2x after we were assured he was insulated.
You right, A big fat nuthin’ happened to Trump, but it hurt their credibility and emboldened our support of Trump.
I don’t know why we’re arguing, and I don’t know anymore than you do about what’s to come. I’m hopeful and am very patient. Hang in there!
Yes, I did read your comment; we all have our opinions. I wasn’t arguing, just sharing that I don’t think it’ll be Trump. I could be wrong. We can agree to disagree, can’t we, fren?
Yes. We’re all fierce in our convictions, and it’s healthy to disagree. I’m very proud of this community.