Bug eyed/drug eyed biden doesn't make any sense if we are talking about deepfakes. Take a look at this latest unreal engine test/demo:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSmN7aXSd5Y
Unreal engine is a game engine which is used to create game's. The above link is a realistic animated face (watch till the end!).
If a game engine can do this, what do you think the deep-state can use technology wise??? They could render something truely realistic in stead of that ...that...that pcp-injected-drug-face.
It doesn't make any sense...It's just all weird.
Unless they actually drugged him up, but could that make his face so different?
It's intentionally becoming more and more obvious...it will get to the point those still pretending everything is normal will have to be shaking with their eyes closed in the fetal position to keep that up.
This is probably the best-known deepfake, of Queen Elizabeth. If you watch, she blinks her eyes. Sorry for YT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvY-Abd2FfM
All I know is that whatever that was.... It wasn't normal at all. Especially for sleepy Joe. His mannerisms we're all wrong and I've never heard him speak like that before. Highly unsettling.... Edit: also this may not be a popular opinion, but I'm starting to think that Biden, or whoever is playing the part, looks demonically possessed. As if whatever was controlling his movements and demeanor was trying to act human and failing miserably. Literally weekend at Bernie's but with a demon. Just my thoughts
For one thing, Unreal is very expensive to lease. One could track down their customers, too. For another, this trailer glosses over a ton of things about making an animation like this. No government slavey is going to sit down and make such a realistic Joe CGI in an afternoon. Unreal has automated a number of things in modeling but it still takes some serious talent and many hours to make a scene, because a game engine is what takes all the inputs of models and scripting and audio and lighting and puts them together. Here's a very good summary of what goes into the engine: https://game-ace.com/blog/unreal-engine-3d-modeling-a-step-by-step-guide/ Read this and picture some flunky doing it on the spur of the moment. This is why I think there is a real Joe, or an actor, and the bugeyed video and all the other strange video details we've seen are the result of video editing. It would have, in the long run, been more convincing to have hired a good modeler and rented Unreal and built up a library of models just for special occasions, but ((they)) who are controlling Joe's appearances didn't have that foresight.
I never said unreal is the package they used or should be using. And software can be copied and modified without having the need to register/buy in order to use it. Hell...they could have implemented (read:stolen) code from various engines...
My point was "this is what can be used publicly" and "now imagine what they have access to"
I think they not only have access to technology years or maybe even generation(s) ahead of what we use but also to gifted people who.
And maybe those people purposely made it none-real...
I don't know, I could be wrong, this is all IMHO.
My point is that their product, video-wise, is far from the quality of Unreal, which is top of the line because it's been developed for years, as have the modeling programs such as were used to make the trailer and Unreal addons. Of course the government could steal it and with the library of models and animations available, make a better rendering of Biden. But they didn't. They don't have talent or time, apparently.
PS Give it a try yourself. https://www.unrealengine.com/en-US/download
Joe was drugged.
You don't need Unreal to generate a deepfake if a deep learning AI (uh, not really true AI, it's just a good pattern mimic) network is used with images/video.
A deep learning AI deepfake would account for the bug eyes. If the AI is trained using regular videos, there would be rather little eye pixels to train the AI with. I doubt there is enough info to train the AI properly for the eyes, and you need to take into account lighting reflections and coordinated movement. An AI would not have instrinsic knowledge of the need for coordinated eye movement, so it may not mimic things very well.
Humans are very sensitive to the eye abnormalities -- any imperfections would show up. If forced to bet, I would put my money on it being a full or partial deepfake. Or even a double in a CIA rubber mask, improved in post-processing using deepfake AI.
I think Joe's handlers are pulling our legs, deliberately messing it up a bit to see who is really paying attention.
Unreal was just meant as an example where the software is (or will be) made available for the public.
Just wanted to point out that whoever is controlling biden could have access to more advanced rendering tech unbeknown to us.
AI is a "scary" thing I have seen (heard) some examples what can be done. For example human like voices, I don't mean those youtube ones. Voices with adapt to the content it reads and becomes so lively it fooled a lot of people. Or when creating music or when mastering music. And that's just the audio category. And in the image editing category I have seen some crazy crazy stuff.
I am just trying to say... "this is available for the public" ... now try to imagine what they have access to.
I stopped being stuck on the uncanny valley I think that has been "solved" but not made publicly. But I need to keep an open mind and this is all just IMHO.
Yeah, no biggie. We're just trying to emphasize different things.
SIGGRAPH demos are often really cool. And that's just publishable research.
But that last part of Joe's vid made so many of us go, WTF?! They could have done a much better fake. But they didn't. Wanted them goggle eyes. That's gotta be deliberate.
Well, it's a movie and I gotta get my popcorn!