Chemotherapy adds only 2% to the 5-year survival rate of cancer patients.
(pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
If I am not mistaken these treatments or poisons cost many tens of thousands of dollars. We have learned that Ivermectin and HCQ could be cancer cures, but big pharma wants to keep a lid on that because they are cheap to manufacture.
Add Quercitin to the mix. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26264923/
Does it make sense to take poisons that cause cancer in order to kill cancer? Does it make sense to take radiation that causes cancer in order to kill cancer?
It does work sometimes.
Cancer is not an easy thing to defeat, since it’s your own body you are attempting to kill off. It’s the poisonous aspect of the treatment that makes it effective. You start to kill off the entire body, hoping to get the cancer first before the rest goes.
Glad I quit smoking and drinking in my 30s.
It makes more sense to quit eating sugar and engage in intermittent fasting and allow autophagy to do its thing.
Since cancer cells are not as robust as normal body cells, they are more susceptible to the stress caused by the chemical or radiological treatments. I get that, but those methods should be far down the list of treatment options, and normally they would be, IF Big Pharma who controls the treatment protocols wasn't getting rich from it, along with the hospitals or clinics who administer the treatments. So the most dangerous options are the first options.
That is exactly how vaccines used to work in days gone by ...
I cannot attest to the efficacy of chemotherapy. Especially not in light of the new found long running medical fraud. However, when you are talking about death as an outcome, 2% is not insignificant. If you are facing death, and taking this stuff increases your survival odds 2%, I'm thinking I'll go ahead and do it.
The other thing that is actually useful about chemotherapy is shrinking down tumors so they are easier to surgically remove. Apparently it causes blood vessels to shrink, so patients in surgery will need less blood units as well as have less risk of uncontrolled bleeding or potential bleed out deaths.
If at some point in life, I am diagnosed with cancer, my first treatment option would be to go on a fast. Cancer cells live on sugar, so a fast will starve the cancer cells, and when the body enters the autophagy stage in a fast, it will consume unneeded cells for energy. In essence the tumor shrinks due to starvation and is killed off by the body for energy. Then the body creates new stem cells which boost the immune system to further kill the cancer. This would be my first treatment option.
And fenbendzolone
B17 as well they try to claim its poison but it's not
https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/248783.World_Without_Cancer
In addition, for late stage Fenbendazole and med beds have shown promise.
i think colonoscopies and chemotherapy are just sick practical jokes invented by the ultra wealthy to laugh at us. when's the last time a world leader went through chemo?
Steve Jobs, probably