Ladies and Gentlemen,
If I might ask your indulgence to permit me to briefly clarify and elaborate upon my previous post here: https://greatawakening.win/p/15IXWdUvR5/true-the-vote--heres-whats-next/
I continue to believe that Gregg Phillips’ data came from the NSA. The just-linked-to post explains my reasoning in detail. Boiled down to its essentials, my reasoning is: if Gregg purchased the data, it would contain informational gaps across devices and timeframes; therefore Gregg either did what he did despite the gaps, or he used a dataset that essentially had no gaps (i.e., the sort of dataset described in my previous post). Gregg plainly has an intelligence background and connections all over the intelligence community. So he was situated to gain access to the dataset, and the only plausible path for completion of his project was to use such data. Therefore, it came from the NSA.
I continue to believe that Gregg used one or more platforms provided to him by the NSA. The platforms he needed already existed. If the NSA was giving him the data, why would it not also furnish him with the platforms required to manipulate the data? Moreover, these sorts of platforms could not be built so quickly that TTV: (i) built the platforms from scratch; (ii) used the platforms to analyze the data to prove out their hypothesis; and (iii) created a movie about the whole affair – all in less than two years. Not remotely plausible. The NSA gave him the platforms.
Here's the most likely situation. The NSA – as a formal matter – did NOT give it to Gregg Phillips. If Nakasone is asked whether his agency gave Phillips the data or the platforms, his answer is “Absolutely Not.” But elements within the NSA absolutely gave the data and the platforms to Phillips. And the NSA can’t admit that. So the NSA is going to say that Gregg stole the data (and probably the platforms). If you listen closely to what Gregg has been saying, he has been talking around the edges of that situation for some time now:
“…We participated in the op. We were part of the op. We were in communication with the target at the behest of the government. We, we were involved deeply in this, in this CI op. I think what’s going to frighten people when they understand the gravity of what it is we’re telling them, and then when we tell them that, in the end, we were betrayed by the United States government, and they turned it on us, and went and told the enemy that it was us that did it. That it was our fault. AND THAT WE HAD PENETRATED THEIR SYSTEMS.” That’s a transcription of an excerpt of an interview Gregg recently participated in, with emphasis in the form of boldfacing added by me.
The NSA is in a terrible bind right now. I believe the NSA is privately accusing him of stealing the data and the platforms, and threatening him with arrest and prosecution, in an effort to silence him. They want to arrest Gregg to shut him down. But if they arrest him for “stealing” the data and the platforms, they confer credibility on the dataset and the methods – because they will have acknowledged that they came right from the NSA, itself – and therefore confer credibility on the conclusions. So they’re in a bind. The NSA needs to shut him down, but can’t afford to arrest him. I think this puts Gregg in a very dangerous position, as the NSA’s options are limited, if you see what I mean.
-simon
Here's another hypothesis you should consider. And since there is little evidence to suggest otherwise, we are making educated guesses (erg, hypothesizing).
Let's broaden the scope of Intelligence agencies to which this information could have originated and let's consider 5-Eyes. Are we to believe white hats are confined to the United States only? My belief is the answer is -- No. Could there be WH involved in 5-Eyes? It's plausible this may be true. Since 5-Eyes share Intel and we have already seen how the black hats like John Clapper and others used 5-Eyes as a legal loop hole to spy on Americans for the Obama Administration, it is very possible that Gregg Phillips' connections could have come from WH sources external to the United States.
What did Greg Phillips mean by stating this:
This sounds like the standard political damage control that we are already familiar with when Seth Rich released to the world the DNC records. The immediate response was the information was "hacked" by Guccifer 2.0 and Russia. The wording Phillips uses are in the past tense. I think this is key to understanding what Phillips is referring to. It is something that has already occurred. Even if it was a future scenario, why wouldn't Greg Phillips not be prescient enough to see the same political response as with Seth Rich? I believe this is what Greg Phillips is referring to. The NSA will always use plausible deniability to maintain an arms distance from being entangled in political theater.
I tend to believe Greg Phillips is acting as a figurehead. The 'goods' are not in his hands and may never have. Evidently from the devastating revelations already publicized (i.e. 2000 Mules), Phillips has maintained his personal protection. Is someone protecting him and TTV? Most likely. Is there a contingency plan if Phillips is somehow removed? Most likely. Q said -- 'Nothing can stop what is coming. Nothing.'
You raise some very interesting hypotheses. It is exhausting to try and hold onto these threads and create an idea of what is happening, only to remember that you can’t tell which threads are not true. Round and round we go.
Slightly related point...looking at web data for patriots.win for the past three months (post on patriots)
The five countries (four almost equal in percentage share of traffic) USA, UK, AUS, CAN. (France approx 4%) forgot if last month or last three months... the COUNTRIES weren’t surprising because duh...English speakers. It was the share of traffic from each country (each around 25% +_ 2) that was surprising.
I’ll try and find the post and update.
I tend to think that taking Gregg Phillips out wouldn't stop anything from coming out. It would just be to punish him and I don't think the black hats would get anything positive out of taking out GP
Seems to me the plan would require infiltration of the deep state and world cabal players, in a similar manner that they have infiltrated state governments around the world. This would have required years of planning and work to get things into position for the final take down. Trump is a part of their plan, but not everything hinges on him. I am hopeful Putin and Xi are part of the plan also. Quite a movie indeed.