Mao Zedong seemed to have carved out a fortress on the mainland. Why an offshore "fortress" in the first place? If so, why not the "fortress" being the island of Hainan? For that matter, North Korea could also work. Incidentally, Hainan Island is where communism started in the China empire. Also, know that the China empire is not exactly a homogeneous one race of people. Rather it is diverse with many different ethnic histories. This is similar to Europe in that regard but now instead with one predominant language. As far as conquest resulting in different dynasties, eastern China is like an Autobahn to which invading armies swept through from every direction. In this sense, it acted as an economic crossroad like Palestine tends to be.
Exactly right. Money power was the fortress for Bolshevik Russia that became the USSR. How did they get this money? It came directly out of NY and western banks. The same money "fortress" funded Mao Zedong.
I regret that this writer is not really reflecting actual history. The Chinese people in all their history have not been one people.
No, Mao was the absolute controller. The Rothschilds funded every aspect of his revolution. The very first thing Mao did was set up the Rothschild fractional reserve banking system in China.
Good comments here. What if the "fortress" was actually Hong Kong? But now that it has been taken over, the CCP globalist are operating from their backup plan in Taiwan? It actually makes more sense to operate from Hong Kong, especially when it was a British Protectorate. Closer, more integrated, and totally outside the control of the CCP nationalists. There is more to the recent Hong Kong takeover than has been revealed so far.
I believe you have made a very good point. Hong Kong has been long cherished as a bastion of enterprise. The CCP has relied on Hong Kong for over 30 years under the CCP to be the outlet to western civilization [and much longer]. Perceptions of CCP forced brutality hasn't help Hong Kong recently, but it acting as a local banking and trade center makes it a plausible place for CCP power. Yet, we are really talking about an ideology for governance that really cannot hide controlling economic power.
The historical connection between Hong Kong and London bankers cannot be ignored. It clearly looks like a mechanism of control by global bankers based in the CITY OF LONDON CORPORATION.
Also, if the Chinese do take Taiwan they'll have the global chip supply by the balls at the same time Russia has the oil supply. We'd be pretty well fucked.
I haven't even bothered to look up the official explanation of the CHIP act because I'm 90% positive it means they're gonna tank whatever domestic usa chip production might form in response to China taking Taiwan. Whatever they say it is will be another misdirection.
Mao Zedong seemed to have carved out a fortress on the mainland. Why an offshore "fortress" in the first place? If so, why not the "fortress" being the island of Hainan? For that matter, North Korea could also work. Incidentally, Hainan Island is where communism started in the China empire. Also, know that the China empire is not exactly a homogeneous one race of people. Rather it is diverse with many different ethnic histories. This is similar to Europe in that regard but now instead with one predominant language. As far as conquest resulting in different dynasties, eastern China is like an Autobahn to which invading armies swept through from every direction. In this sense, it acted as an economic crossroad like Palestine tends to be.
Naw, I'm not buying the logic here.
What USSR are talking about/ There is no USSR since the 1990s.
Exactly right. Money power was the fortress for Bolshevik Russia that became the USSR. How did they get this money? It came directly out of NY and western banks. The same money "fortress" funded Mao Zedong.
I regret that this writer is not really reflecting actual history. The Chinese people in all their history have not been one people.
Mao was the face but did that make him the controller?
No, Mao was the absolute controller. The Rothschilds funded every aspect of his revolution. The very first thing Mao did was set up the Rothschild fractional reserve banking system in China.
reread your response was mao in control? or the banks? even the redsheilds dont own all the banks
Good comments here. What if the "fortress" was actually Hong Kong? But now that it has been taken over, the CCP globalist are operating from their backup plan in Taiwan? It actually makes more sense to operate from Hong Kong, especially when it was a British Protectorate. Closer, more integrated, and totally outside the control of the CCP nationalists. There is more to the recent Hong Kong takeover than has been revealed so far.
I believe you have made a very good point. Hong Kong has been long cherished as a bastion of enterprise. The CCP has relied on Hong Kong for over 30 years under the CCP to be the outlet to western civilization [and much longer]. Perceptions of CCP forced brutality hasn't help Hong Kong recently, but it acting as a local banking and trade center makes it a plausible place for CCP power. Yet, we are really talking about an ideology for governance that really cannot hide controlling economic power.
The historical connection between Hong Kong and London bankers cannot be ignored. It clearly looks like a mechanism of control by global bankers based in the CITY OF LONDON CORPORATION.
Who knows? Hong Kong may be the CCP parasite controlling it all.
Hainan was my thought too.
Also, if the Chinese do take Taiwan they'll have the global chip supply by the balls at the same time Russia has the oil supply. We'd be pretty well fucked.
I haven't even bothered to look up the official explanation of the CHIP act because I'm 90% positive it means they're gonna tank whatever domestic usa chip production might form in response to China taking Taiwan. Whatever they say it is will be another misdirection.